Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

Ercolano 2012 (8019396514).jpg

The excavations of Ercolano
Herculaneum is located in Italy

Herculaneum
Shown within Italy
Alternative name Ercolano
Location ErcolanoCampania, Italy
Coordinates 40.8060°N 14.3482°ECoordinates40.8060°N 14.3482°E
Type Settlement
History
Founded 6th – 7th century BC
Abandoned 79 AD
Site notes
Website Herculaneum – Official website
Official name Archaeological Areas of Pompeii, Herculaneum, and Torre Annunziata
Type Cultural
Criteria iii, iv, v
Designated 1997 (21st session)
Reference no. 829
Region Europe and North America

Located in the shadow of Mount

VesuviusHerculaneum (ItalianErcolano) was an ancient Roman town destroyed by volcanicpyroclastic flows in 79 AD. Its ruins are located in the comune of ErcolanoCampania, Italy.

As a UNESCO World Heritage Site, it is famous as one of the few ancient cities that can now be seen in much of its original splendour, as well as for having been lost, along with PompeiiStabiaeOplontis and Boscoreale, in the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79 that buried it. Unlike Pompeii, the deep pyroclastic material which covered it preserved wooden and other organic-based objects such as roofs, beds, doors, food and even some 300 skeletons which were discovered in recent years along the seashore. It had been thought until then that the town had been evacuated by the inhabitants.

Herculaneum was a wealthier town than Pompeii, possessing an extraordinary density of fine houses with, for example, far more lavish use of coloured marble cladding.

History of Herculaneum

Herculaneum plan showing buildings below modern town

Ancient tradition connected Herculaneum with the name of the Greek hero Heracles(Hercules in Latin and consequently Roman Mythology),[1] an indication that the city was of Greek origin. In fact, it seems that some forefathers of the Samnite tribes of the Italian mainland founded the first civilization on the site of Herculaneum at the end of the 6th century BC. Soon after, the town came under Greek control and was used as a trading post because of its proximity to the Gulf of Naples. The Greeks named the city Ἡράκλειον, Heraklion. In the 4th century BC, Herculaneum again came under the domination of the Samnites. The city remained under Samnite control until it became a Roman municipium in 89 BC, when, having participated in the Social War(“War of The Allies” against Rome), it was defeated by Titus Didius, a legate of Sulla.

After the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, the town of Herculaneum was buried under approximately 20 metres (50–60 feet) of ash. It lay hidden and largely intact until discoveries from wells and underground tunnels became gradually more widely known, and notably following the Prince d’Elbeuf’s explorations in the early 18th century.[2] Excavations continued sporadically up to the present and today many streets and buildings are visible, although over 75% of the town remains buried. Today, the Italian towns of Ercolano and Porticilie on the approximate site of Herculaneum. Until 1969 the town of Ercolano was called Resina. It changed its name to Ercolano, the Italian modernisation of the ancient name in honour of the old city.

The inhabitants worshipped above all Hercules, who was believed to be the founder of both the town and Mount Vesuvius. Other important deities worshipped include Venus and Apollo, who are depicted in multiple statues in the city.

The eruption of AD 79

Herculaneum and other cities affected by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius. The black cloud represents the general distribution of ash and cinder. Modern coast lines are shown.

Bronze horse excavated at Resina Theater (Herculaneum).

The catastrophic eruption of Mt. Vesuvius occurred on the afternoon of 24 August AD 79. Because Vesuvius had been dormant for approximately 800 years, it was no longer even recognized as a volcano.

Based on archaeological excavations and on two letters of Pliny the Younger to the Roman historian Tacitus, the course of the eruption can be reconstructed.[3]

At around 1pm on 24 August, Vesuvius began spewing volcanic ash and stone thousands of meters into the sky. When it reached the tropopause (the boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere), the top of the cloud flattened, prompting Pliny to describe it to Tacitus as a stone pine tree. The prevailing winds at the time blew toward the southeast, causing the volcanic material to fall primarily on the city of Pompeii and the surrounding area. New studies have been carried out on the victims’ skeletons and it has been established that some of the minerals stored in the bones are preserved.[4]Since Herculaneum lay to the west of Vesuvius, it was only mildly affected by the first phase of the eruption. While roofs in Pompeii collapsed under the weight of falling debris, only a few centimeters of ash fell on Herculaneum, causing little damage but nonetheless prompting most inhabitants to flee.

During the following night, the eruptive column which had risen into the stratosphere collapsed onto Vesuvius and its flanks. The first pyroclastic surge, formed by a mixture of ash and hot gases, billowed through the mostly evacuated town of Herculaneum at 160 km/h (100 mph). A succession of six flows and surges buried the city’s buildings, causing little damage in some areas and preserving structures, objects and victims almost intact. However, in other areas there was significant damage, knocking down walls, tearing away columns and other large objects;[5] a marble statue of M. Nonius Balbus near the baths was blown 15 m away and a carbonised skeleton was found lifted 2.5 m above ground level in the garden of the House of the Relief of Telephus.[6]

Recent multidisciplinary research on the lethal effects of the pyroclastic surges in the Vesuvius area showed that in the vicinity of Pompeii and Herculaneum, heat was the main cause of the death of people who had previously been thought to have died by ash suffocation. This study shows that exposure to the surges, measuring at least 250 °C (482 °F) even at a distance of 10 kilometres from the vent, was sufficient to cause the instant death of all residents, even if they were sheltered within buildings.[7]

Archaeology

In 1709 the digging of a deep well revealed some exceptional statues at the lowest levels which was later found to be the site of the theatre. The Prince d’Elbeuf purchased the land and proceeded to tunnel out from the bottom of the well, collecting any statues they could find. Among the earliest statues recovered were the two superbly sculpted Herculaneum Women[8] now in the Dresden Skulpturensammlung.[9]

Small Herculaneum Woman (Dresden)

Major excavation was resumed in 1738 by Spanish engineer Rocque Joaquin de Alcubierre. The elaborate publication of Le Antichità di Ercolano (“The Antiquities of Herculaneum”) under the patronage of the King of the Two Sicilies had an effect on incipient European Neoclassicism out of all proportion to its limited circulation; in the later 18th century, motifs from Herculaneum began to appear on stylish furnishings, from decorative wall-paintings and tripod tables to perfume burners and teacups. However, excavation ceased once the nearby town of Pompeii was discovered, which was significantly easier to excavate because of the thinner layer of debris covering the site (4 m as opposed to Herculaneum’s 20 m).

Barker noted in his 1908 Buried Herculaneum, “By the orders of Francis I land was purchased, and in 1828 excavations were begun in two parts 150 feet apart, under the direction of the architect. Carlo Bonucci. In the year 1868 still further purchases of land were made, and excavations were carried on in an eastward direction till 1875. The total area now open measures 300 by 150 perches (1510 by 755 8 metres). The limits of the excavations to the north and east respectively are the modern streets of Vico di Mare and Vico Ferrara. It is here only that any portion of ancient Herculaneum may be seen in the open day.”[10]

From 1927 until 1942 a new campaign of excavations was begun by Amedeo Maiuri, which exposed about four hectares of the ancient city in the archaeological park that is visible today.

Excavation resumed briefly in the town in 1980–81 on the ancient shoreline following which the skeletons in the boathouses were found.

From 1996–99 the large area to the north-west of the site was excavated and exposed, including part of the Villa of the Papyri, the north-west baths,[11] the House of the Dionysian Reliefs[12] and a large collapsed monument. This area was left in a chaotic state and from 2000–7 further work on conservation of this area was done.

Many public and private buildings, including the forum complex, are yet to be excavated.

The Site

 

Insulae numbers

The buildings at the site are grouped in blocks (insulae), defined by the intersection of the east-west (cardi) and north-south (decumani) streets. Hence we have Insula II – Insula VII running counterclockwise from Insula II. To the east are two additional blocks: Orientalis I (oI) and Orientalis II (oII). To the south of Orientalis I (oI) lies one additional group of buildings known as the “Suburban District” (SD). Individual buildings having their own entrance number. For example, the House of the Deer is labelled (Ins IV, 3).

The House of Aristides (Ins II, 1)

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

Cupids playing with a lyre, Roman fresco from Herculaneum

The first building in insula II is the House of Aristides. The entrance opens directly onto the atrium, but the remains of the house are not particularly well preserved due to damage caused by previous excavations. The lower floor was probably used for storage.

The House of Argus (Ins II, 2)

The second house in insula II got its name from a fresco of Argus and Io which once adorned a reception room off the large peristyle. The fresco is now lost, but its name lives on. This building must have been one of the finer villas in Herculaneum. The discovery of the house in the late 1820s was notable because it was the first time a second floor had been unearthed in such detail. The excavation revealed a second floor balcony overlooking Cardo III, as well as wooden shelving and cupboards; however, with the passing of time, these elements have been lost.

The House of the Genius (Ins II, 3)[edit]

To the north of the House of Argus lies the House of the Genius. It has been only partially excavated but it appears to have been a spacious building. The house derives its name from the statue of a cupid that formed part of a candlestick. In the centre of the peristyle are the remains of a rectangular basin.

The House of the Alcove (Ins IV)

The house is actually two buildings joined together. As a consequence of this it is a mixture of plain and simple rooms combined with some highly decorated ones.

The atrium is covered, so lacks the usual impluvium. It retains its original flooring of opus tesselatum and opus sectile. Off the atrium is a biclinium richly decorated with frescoes in the fourth style and a large triclinium which originally had a marble floor. A number of other rooms, one of which is the apsed alcove after which the house was named, can be reached via a hall which gets its light from a small courtyard.

College of the Augustales

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

A marble tablet from Herculaneum showing women playing knucklebones, depicting PhoebeLetoNiobe, Hilearia, and Agle, painted and signed by an artist named “Alexander of Athens”, now in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale (Naples)

Temple of the augustales or priests of the Imperial cult.

Central Thermae

The Central Thermae were bath houses built around the first century AD. Bath houses were very common at that time, especially in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Per common practice, there were two different bath areas, one for men and the other for women. These houses were extremely popular, attracting many visitors daily. This cultural hub was also home to several works of art, which can be found in various areas of the Central Thermae site.

Villa of the Papyri

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

A fresco depicting Theseus, from Herculaneum (Ercolano), Italy, 45–79 AD

The most famous of the luxurious villas at Herculaneum is the “Villa of the Papyri.” It was once identified as the magnificent seafront retreat for Lucius Calpurnius Piso CaesoninusJulius Caesar‘s father-in-law; however, the objects thought to be associated with Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesonius correspond more closely to a greatly standardized assemblage, and cannot indicate, with certainty, the owner of the villa.[13] The villa stretches down towards the sea in four terraces. Piso, a literate man who patronized poets and philosophers, built a fine library there, the only one to survive intact from antiquity.

Between 1752 and 1754 a number of blackened unreadable papyrus scrolls were serendipitously recovered from the Villa of the Papyri by workmen. These scrolls became known as the Herculaneum papyri or scrolls, the majority of which are today stored at the National Library, Naples. The scrolls are badly carbonized, but a large number have been unrolled, with varying degrees of success. Computer-enhanced multi-spectral imaging, in the infra-red range, helps make the ink legible. There is now a real prospect that it will be possible to read the unopened rolls using X-rays.[14] The same techniques could be applied to the rolls waiting to be discovered in the as-yet unexcavated part of the villa, eliminating the need for potentially damaging the rolls by unrolling them.

A team spent a month in summer 2009, making numerous X-ray scans of two of the rolls that are stored at the French National Academy in Paris. They hoped that computer processing would convert the scans into digital images showing the interiors of the rolls and revealing the ancient writing. The main fear, however, was that the Roman writers might have used carbon-based inks, which would be essentially invisible to the scans. That fear has turned out to be fact. They had hoped that re-scanning the rolls with more powerful X-ray equipment would reveal the text.[15] However, subsequent X-rays have still produced nothing legible.[16] Still, the hundreds, possibly thousands of scrolls still buried at the site may yet prove to have legible text someday. As of 2016, research and experimentation has recovered more scrolls and it is suggested that new techniques will allow more to be read without unrolling them.

Skeletal remains

Giacobbe Giusti, Herculaneum

 

“Boat houses” where skeletons were found

“Boat houses” with skeletons

The skeleton called the “Ring Lady” unearthed in Herculaneum.

In 1981, under site administrator Dr. Giuseppe Maggi, excavations initially turned up more than 55 skeletons (30 adult males, 13 adult females and 12 children) on the beach and in the first six boat chambers. Because earlier excavations had revealed only a few skeletons, it was long thought that nearly all of the inhabitants had managed to escape, but this surprising discovery led to a change of view. The last inhabitants waiting for rescue from the sea were killed instantly by the intense heat, despite being sheltered from direct impact. The study of victims’ postures and the effects on their skeletons indicate that the first surge caused instant death as a result of fulminant shock due to a temperature of about 500 °C (932 °F). The intense heat caused contraction of hands and feet and possibly fracture of bones and teeth.[17]

Further excavations in the 1990s revealed a total of at least three hundred skeletons huddled close together in twelve arches facing the sea and on the beach, while the town was almost completely evacuated. The “Ring Lady” (see image), named for the rings on her fingers, was discovered in 1982.

Chemical analysis of the remains has led to greater insight into the health and nutrition of the Herculaneum population. Dr. Sara C. Bisel(1932–1996) was a physical anthropologist and classical archaeologist who played a prominent role in early scientific research at Herculaneum. Her pioneering work in the chemical and physical analysis of skeletons yielded new insights into the nutrition and health of ancient populations. This was considered ground-breaking and helped advance the field of paleodemography. Quantities of lead were found in some of the skeletons, which led some to speculation of lead poisoning. Also the presence of scarring on the pelvis, for instance, may give some indication of the number of children a woman had borne.[18]

Casts of skeletons were also produced, to replace the original bones after taphonomic study, scientific documentation and excavation. In contrast to Pompeii, where casts resembling the body features of the victims were produced by filling the body imprints in the ash deposit with plaster, the shape of corpses at Herculaneum could not be preserved, due to the rapid vaporization and replacement of the flesh of the victims by the hot ash (ca. 500 °C). A cast of the skeletons unearthed within chamber 10 is on display at the Museum of Anthropology in Naples. The most significant and extensive study of a sample of the skeletal remains of the Herculaneum victims is that published by Luigi Capasso in 2001. This study which employed X rays has superseded the earlier work by Bisel [19]

Issues of conservation

Herculaneum, Ercolano, and Vesuvius

The volcanic water, ash and debris covering Herculaneum, along with the extreme heat, left it in a remarkable state of preservation for over 1600 years. However, once excavations began, exposure to the elements began the slow process of deterioration. This was not helped by the methods of archaeology used earlier in the town’s excavation, which generally centered around recovering valuable artifacts rather than ensuring the survival of all artifacts. In the early 1980s and under the direction of Dr. Sara C. Bisel, preservation of the skeletal remains became a high priority. The carbonised remains of organic materials, when exposed to the air, deteriorated over a matter of days, and destroyed many of the remains until a way of preserving them was formed.

Today, tourism and vandalism have damaged many of the areas open to the public, and water damage coming from the modern Ercolanohas undermined many of the foundations of the buildings. Reconstruction efforts have often proved counterproductive. However, in modern times conservation efforts have been more successful. Today excavations have been temporarily discontinued, in order to direct all funding to help save the city.

A large number of artifacts from Herculaneum are preserved in the Naples National Archaeological Museum.

A private-public partnership, the Herculaneum Conservation Project, has taken a lead restoring Herculaneum. In 2012, UNESCO’s director general praised Herculaneum as a model “whose best practices surely can be replicated in other similar vast archaeological areas across the world”[20]

Photos

Documentaries

Notes

  1. Jump up^ The founding myth asserted that Hercules built Herculaneum at the location where he killed Cacus, a son of Vulcan who had stolen some of Hercules’ cattle.
  2. Jump up^ Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew (2011). Herculaneum: Past and FutureISBN 978-0-7112-3142-9.
  3. Jump up^ Available at the University of Arizona: Pliny the Younger, Letters 6.16 and 6.20 to Cornelius Tacitus and in Project GutenbergLetter LXV — To TacitusLetter LXVI — To Cornelius Tacitus
  4. Jump up^ “A hypothesis of sudden body fluid vaporization in the 79 AD victims of Vesuvius”.
  5. Jump up^http://www.herculaneum.ox.ac.uk/files/newsletters/harchissue2.pdfp 3
  6. Jump up^ “House of the Relief of Telephus – AD79eruption”sites.google.com.
  7. Jump up^ Mastrolorenzo, G; Petrone, P; Pappalardo, L; Guarino, FM (15 June 2010). “Lethal thermal impact at periphery of pyroclastic surges: evidences at Pompeii”PLoS ONE5 (6): e11127. Bibcode:2010PLoSO…511127Mdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011127PMC 2886100PMID 20559555.
  8. Jump up^ THE LARGE AND THE SMALL HERCULANEUM WOMAN, Universita Ca’ Foscari, Venezia, Doctoral Thesis 2014–2015, Angeliki Ntontou
  9. Jump up^ The Herculaneum Women: And the Origins of Archaeology (J. Paul Getty Museum) – 7 Feb 2008, Daehner
  10. Jump up^ Ethel Ross Barker (1908). “Buried Herculaneum”.
  11. Jump up^ “Northwest Baths – AD79eruption”sites.google.com.
  12. Jump up^ “House of the Dionysian Reliefs – AD79eruption”sites.google.com.
  13. Jump up^ The World of Pompeii. Edited by John J. Dobbins and Pedar W. Foss 2008
  14. Jump up^ “Digital Exploration: Unwrapping the Secrets of Damaged Manuscripts”http://www.research.uky.edu. Retrieved 2016-12-16.
  15. Jump up^ “UK scientists stymied in effort to read ancient scrolls”kentucky. Retrieved 2016-12-16.
  16. Jump up^ “UK scientists stymied in effort to read ancient scrolls”kentucky. Retrieved 2016-12-16.
  17. Jump up^ Mastrolorenzo, G.; Petrone, P.P.; Pagano, M.; Incoronato, A.; Baxter, P.J.; Canzanella, A.; Fattore, L. (2001). “Herculaneum Victims of Vesuvius in AD 79” (PDF)Nature410 (6830): 769–770. Bibcode:2001Natur.410..769Mdoi:10.1038/35071167PMID 11298433.
  18. Jump up^ Recently Dr Estelle Lazer of the University of Sydney has questioned some of these findings in Resurrecting Pompeii (2009).
  19. Jump up^ Capasso, Luigi (2001). I fuggiaschi di Ercolano. Paleobiologia delle vittime dell’ eruzione vesuviana del 79 d.C. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.
  20. Jump up^ Hammer, Joshua. “The Fall and Rise and Fall of Pompeii”. Retrieved 2015-07-01.
  21. Jump up^ Walker, Susan; Higgs, Peter (2001), “Painting with a portrait of a woman in profile”, in Walker, Susan; Higgs, Peter, Cleopatra of Egypt: from History to Myth, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press (British Museum Press), pp. 314–315, ISBN 9780691088358.
  22. Jump up^ Fletcher, Joann (2008). Cleopatra the Great: The Woman Behind the Legend. New York: Harper. ISBN 978-0-06-058558-7, image plates and captions between pp. 246-247.
  23. Jump up^ “Herculaneum: DVD: Diaries of Light and Darkness”WorldCat. Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Retrieved 17 April 2013.

Further reading

  • Brennan, B. 2018.Herculaneum A Roman Town Reborn. Sydney: Ancient History Seminars.
  • Brennan, B. 2012. Herculaneum A Sourcebook. Sydney: Ancient History Seminars.
  • Capasso, L. 2001. I fuggiaschi di Ercolano. Paleobiologia delle vittime dell’ eruzione vesuviana del 79 d.C. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider
  • Daehner, J., ed. 2007. The Herculaneum Women: History, Context, Identities. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum.
  • De Carolis, E., and G. Patricelli. 2003. Vesuvius, A.D. 79: The Destruction of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum.
  • Deiss, J. J. 1995. The Town of Hercules: A Buried Treasure Trove.Malibu, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum.
  • Lazer, E. 2009. Resurrecting Pompeii. London: Routledge.
  • Pace, S. 2000. Herculaneum and European Culture Between the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Naples, Italy: Electa.
  • Pagano, M. 2000. Herculaneum: A Reasoned Archaeological Itinerary. Translated by A. Pesce. Naples, Italy: T&M.
  • Pagano, M., and A. Balasco. 2000. The Ancient Theatre of Herculaneum. Translated by C. Fordham. Naples, Italy: Electa.
  • Pirozzi, M. E. A. 2000. Herculaneum: The Excavations, Local History and Surroundings. Naples, Italy : Electa.
  • Scarth, A. 2009. Vesuvius: A Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2011. “The Monumental Centre of Herculaneum: In Search of the Identities of the Public Buildings.” Journal of Roman Archaeology 24:121-160.

References

  • National Geographic, Vol 162, No 6. Buried Roman Town Give Up Its Dead, (December, 1982)
  • National Geographic, Vol 165, No 5. The Dead Do Tell Tales, (May, 1984)
  • Discover, magazine, Vol 5, No 10. The Bone Lady (October, 1984)
  • The Mayo Alumnus, Vol 19, No2. An Archaeologist’s Preliminary Report: Time Warp at Herculaneum, (April, 1983)
  • Carnegie Mellon Magazine, Vol 4, No 2. Bone Lady Reconstructs People at Herculaneum, Winter, 1985
  • In the Shadow of Vesuvius National Geographic Special, (11 February 1987)
  • 30 years of National Geographic Special, (25 January 1995)
  • Petrone P.P., Fedele F. (a cura di), 2002. Vesuvio 79 A.D. Vita e morte ad Ercolano, Fridericiana Editrice Universitaria, Napoli.
  • Antonio Virgili, Culti misterici ed orientali a Pompei, Gangemi, Roma, 2008.
  • National Geographic, Vol 212, No 3. Vesuvius. Asleep for Now,(September, 2006) http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/09/vesuvius/vesuvius-text

 

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Justinian, Mosaikdetail aus der Kirche San Vitale in Ravenna

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Das Karolingerreich zur Zeit Karls des Großen und die späteren Teilreiche

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Detail of the votive crown of Visigoth king Reccesuinth († 672). Made of gold and precious stones in the 2nd half of the 7th century. It’s part of the so-called Treasure of Guarrazar.

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

L’« Europe » à la veille de l’an mille ; un demi-millénaire de transition lui a donné un visage nouveau. Les aires culturelles sont durablement installées, l’héritage romain se perpétue dans les deux empires qui se le disputent, le Saint-Empire romain germanique qui perpétue la culture latinetrès présente dans les monastères et dans l’église de Rome, et l’Empire romain d’Orient qui perpétue la culture grecque très présente dans les églises orientales.

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Vikingos daneses invadiendo Inglaterra. Ilustración del siglo XII.

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Giustiniano, mosaico nella chiesa di San Vitale a Ravenna

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Rilievo dell’altare del Duca Rachisarte longobarda, 730-740, Museo diocesano cristiano e del tesoro del duomo di Cividale del Friuli

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

Croce nastriforme, VII secolo, 10 cm, VeronaMuseo di Castel Vecchio

Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe

 

Early Middle Ages
Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe
Charlemagne’s empire included most of modern France, Germany, the Low Countries, Austria and northern Italy.



The Early Middle Ages or Early Medieval Period, typically regarded as lasting from the 5th or 6th century to the 10th century CE,[1] marked the start of the Middle Ages of European history. The term “Late Antiquity” is used to emphasize elements of continuity with the Roman Empire, while “Early Middle Ages” is used to emphasize developments characteristic of the later medieval period. As such it overlaps with Late Antiquity, following the decline of the Western Roman Empire, and precedes the High Middle Ages (c. 10th to 13th centuries).

The period saw a continuation of trends evident since late classical antiquity, including population decline, especially in urban centres, a decline of trade, a small rise in global warming and increased migration. The Early Middle Ages was labelled the “Dark Ages” in the 19th century, a characterization based on the relative scarcity of literary and cultural output from this time. However, the Eastern Roman Empire, or Byzantine Empire, continued to survive, though in the 7th century the Islamic caliphates conquered swathes of formerly Roman territory.

Many of these trends were reversed later in the period. In 800 the title of emperor was revived in Western Europe by Charlemagne, whose Carolingian Empire greatly affected later European social structure and history. Europe experienced a return to systematic agriculture in the form of the feudal system which introduced such innovations as three-field planting and the heavy plough. Barbarian migration stabilized in much of Europe, although the north was greatly affected by the Viking expansion.

History

Collapse of Rome

Starting in the 2nd century, various indicators of Roman civilization began to decline, including urbanization, seaborne commerce, and population. Archaeologists have identified only 40 per cent as many Mediterranean shipwrecks from the 3rd century as from the first.[2]Estimates of the population of the Roman Empire during the period from 150 to 400 suggest a fall from 65 million to 50 million, a decline of more than 20 per cent. Some scholars have connected this de-population to the Dark Ages Cold Period (300–700), when a decrease in global temperatures impaired agricultural yields.[3][4]

Die Hunnen im Kampf mit den Alanen, (The Huns in battle with the Alans by Johann Nepomuk Geiger, 1873). The Alans, an Iranian peoplewho lived north and east of the Black Sea, functioned as Europe’s first line of defence against the Asiatic Huns.[citation needed] They were dislocated and settled throughout the Roman Empire

Early in the 3rd century Germanic peoples migrated south from Scandinavia and reached the Black Sea, creating formidable confederations which opposed the local Sarmatians. In Dacia (present-day Romania) and on the steppes north of the Black Sea the Goths, a Germanic people, established at least two kingdoms: Therving and Greuthung.[5]

The arrival of the Huns in 372–375 ended the history of these kingdoms. The Huns, a confederation of central Asian tribes, founded an empire. They had mastered the difficult art of shooting composite recurve bows from horseback. The Goths sought refuge in Roman territory (376), agreeing to enter the Empire as unarmed settlers. However many bribed the Danube border-guards into allowing them to bring their weapons.

The discipline and organization of a Roman legion made it a superb fighting unit. The Romans preferred infantry to cavalry because infantry could be trained to retain the formation in combat, while cavalry tended to scatter when faced with opposition. While a barbarian army could be raised and inspired by the promise of plunder, the legions required a central government and taxation to pay for salaries, constant training, equipment, and food. The decline in agricultural and economic activity reduced the empire’s taxable income and thus its ability to maintain a professional army to defend itself from external threats.

The Barbarians’ Invasions
Giacobbe Giusti, Early Medieval Europe
The destruction of the Gothic kingdoms by the Huns in 372–375 triggered the Germanic migrations of the 5th century. The Visigoths captured and looted the city of Rome in 410; the Vandals followed suit in 455


In the Gothic War (376–382), the Goths revolted and confronted the main Roman army in the Battle of Adrianople (378). By this time, the distinction in the Roman army between Roman regulars and barbarian auxiliaries had broken down, and the Roman army comprised mainly barbarians and soldiers recruited for a single campaign. The general decline in discipline also led to the use of smaller shields and lighter weaponry.[6] Not wanting to share the glory, Eastern Emperor Valensordered an attack on the Therving infantry under Fritigern without waiting for Western Emperor Gratian, who was on the way with reinforcements. While the Romans were fully engaged, the Greuthung cavalry arrived. Only one-third of the Roman army managed to escape. This represented the most shattering defeat that the Romans had suffered since the Battle of Cannae (216 BCE), according to the Roman military writer Ammianus Marcellinus.[7] The core army of the Eastern Roman Empire was destroyed, Valens was killed, and the Goths were freed to lay waste to the Balkans, including the armories along the Danube. As Edward Gibbon comments, “The Romans, who so coolly and so concisely mention the acts of justice which were exercised by the legions, reserve their compassion and their eloquence for their own sufferings, when the provinces were invaded and desolated by the arms of the successful Barbarians.”[8]

The empire lacked the resources, and perhaps the will, to reconstruct the professional mobile army destroyed at Adrianople, so it had to rely on barbarian armies to fight for it. The Eastern Roman Empiresucceeded in buying off the Goths with tribute. The Western Roman Empire proved less fortunate. Stilicho, the western empire’s half-Vandal military commander, stripped the Rhine frontier of troops to fend off invasions of Italy by the Visigoths in 402–03 and by other Goths in 406–07.

Fleeing before the advance of the Huns, the VandalsSuebi, and Alans launched an attack across the frozen Rhine near Mainz; on 31 December, 406, the frontier gave way and these tribes surged into Roman Gaul. There soon followed the Burgundians and bands of the Alamanni. In the fit of anti-barbarian hysteria which followed, the Western Roman Emperor Honorius had Stilicho summarily beheaded (408). Stilicho submitted his neck, “with a firmness not unworthy of the last of the Roman generals“, wrote Gibbon. Honorius was left with only worthless courtiers to advise him. In 410, the Visigoths led by Alaric Icaptured the city of Rome and for three days fire and slaughter ensued as bodies filled the streets, palaces were stripped of their valuables, and the invaders interrogated and tortured those citizens thought to have hidden wealth. As newly converted Christians, the Goths respected church property, but those who found sanctuary in the Vatican and in other churches were the fortunate few.

Migration Period

Migration Period
The Mausoleum of Theodoric in Ravenna is the only extant example of Ostrogothic architecture.
Around 500, the Visigoths ruled large parts of what is now France, Spain, Andorra and Portugal.

The Roman Empire was not “conquered” by Germanic tribes, but overrun and even completely displaced by the flood of Germanic migrants. The Goths and Vandals were only the first of many waves of invaders that flooded Western Europe. Some lived only for war and pillage and disdained Roman ways. Other peoples had been in prolonged contact with the Roman civilization, and were, to a certain degree, romanized. “A poor Roman plays the Goth, a rich Goth the Roman” said King Theoderic of the Ostrogoths.[9] The subjects of the Roman empire were a mix of Catholic ChristianArian ChristianNestorian Christian, and pagan. The Germanic peoples knew little of cities, money, or writing, and were still mostly pagan, though were becoming increasingly Arian. Arianism was a branch of Christianity that was first proposed early in the 4th century by the Alexandrian presbyter Arius. Arius proclaimed that Christ is not truly divine but a created being. His basic premise was the uniqueness of God, who is alone self-existent and immutable; the Son, who is not self-existent, cannot be God.

During the migrations, or Völkerwanderung (wandering of the peoples), the earlier settled populations were sometimes left intact though usually partially or entirely displaced. Roman culture north of the Po River was almost entirely displaced by the migrations. Whereas the peoples of France, Italy, and Spain continued to speak the dialects of Latin that today constitute the Romance languages, the language of the smaller Roman-era population of what is now England disappeared with barely a trace in the territories settled by the Anglo-Saxons, although the Brittanic kingdoms of the west remained Brythonic speakers. The new peoples greatly altered established society, including law, culture, religion, and patterns of property ownership.

paten from the Treasure of Gourdon

The pax Romana had provided safe conditions for trade and manufacture, and a unified cultural and educational milieu of far-ranging connections. As this was lost, it was replaced by the rule of local potentates, sometimes members of the established Romanized ruling elite, sometimes new lords of alien culture. In AquitaniaGallia Narbonensis, southern Italy and Sicily, Baetica or southern Spain, and the Iberian Mediterranean coast, Roman culture lasted until the 6th or 7th centuries.

The gradual breakdown and transformation of economic and social linkages and infrastructure resulted in increasingly localized outlooks. This breakdown was often fast and dramatic as it became unsafe to travel or carry goods over any distance; there was a consequent collapse in trade and manufacture for export. Major industries that depended on trade, such as large-scale pottery manufacture, vanished almost overnight in places like Britain. Tintagel in Cornwall, as well as several other centres, managed to obtain supplies of Mediterranean luxury goods well into the 6th century, but then lost their trading links. Administrative, educational and military infrastructure quickly vanished, and the loss of the established cursus honorum led to the collapse of the schools and to a rise of illiteracy even among the leadership. The careers of Cassiodorus (died c. 585) at the beginning of this period and of Alcuin of York (died 804) at its close were founded alike on their valued literacy. For the formerly Roman area, there was another 20 per cent decline in population between 400 and 600, or a one-third decline for 150-600.[10] In the 8th century, the volume of trade reached its lowest level. The very small number of shipwrecksfound that dated from the 8th century supports this (which represents less than 2 per cent of the number of shipwrecks dated from the 1st century). There were also reforestation and a retreat of agriculture centred around 500.

The Romans had practiced two-field agriculture, with a crop grown in one field and the other left fallow and ploughed under to eliminate weeds. Systematic agriculture largely disappeared and yields declined. It is estimated that the Plague of Justinian which began in 541 and recurred periodically for 150 years thereafter killed as many as 100 million people across the world.[11][12] Some historians such as Josiah C. Russell (1958) have suggested a total European population loss of 50 to 60 per cent between 541 and 700.[13] After the year 750, major epidemic diseases did not appear again in Europe until the Black Death of the 14th century. The disease Smallpox, which was eradicated in the late 20th century, did not definitively enter Western Europe until about 581 when Bishop Gregory of Tours provided an eyewitness account that describes the characteristic findings of smallpox.[14] Waves of epidemics wiped out large rural populations.[15]Most of the details about the epidemics are lost, probably due to the scarcity of surviving written records.

For almost a thousand years, Rome was the most politically important, richest and largest city in Europe.[16] Around 100 CE, it had a population of about 450,000,[17] and declined to a mere 20,000 during the Early Middle Ages, reducing the sprawling city to groups of inhabited buildings interspersed among large areas of ruins and vegetation.

Byzantine Empire

Byzantine Empire
Byzantium under the Justinian dynasty

  • Under Emperor Justinian (r. 527-65), the Byzantines were able to reestablish Roman rule in Italy and most of North Africa.

The death of Theodosius I in 395 was followed by the division of the empire between his two sons. The Western Roman Empiredisintegrated into a mosaic of warring Germanic kingdoms in the 5th century, making the Eastern Roman Empire in Constantinople the legal successor to the classical Roman Empire. After Greek replaced Latin as the official language of the Empire, historians refer to the empire as “Byzantine”. Westerners would gradually begin to refer to it as “Greek” rather than “Roman”. The inhabitants, however, always called themselves Romaioi, or Romans.

The Eastern Roman Empire aimed to retain control of the trade routes between Europe and the Orient, which made the Empire the richest polity in Europe. Making use of their sophisticated warfare and superior diplomacy, the Byzantines managed to fend off assaults by the migrating barbarians. Their dreams of subduing the Western potentates briefly materialized during the reign of Justinian I in 527–565. Not only did Justinian restore some western territories to the Roman Empire, but he also codified Roman law (with his codificationremaining in force in many areas of Europe until the 19th century) and built the largest and the most technically advanced edifice of the Early Middle Ages, the Hagia Sophia. A bubonic plague pandemic,[18][19] the Plague of Justinian, marred Justinian’s reign, however, infecting the Emperor, killing perhaps 40% of the population of Constantinople.

TheodoraJustinian‘s wife, and her retinue[20]

Justinian’s successors Maurice and Heracliusconfronted invasions by the Avar and Slavic tribes. After the devastations by the Slavs and the Avars, large areas of the Balkans became depopulated. In 626 Constantinople, by far the largest city of early medieval Europe, withstood a combined siege by Avars and Persians. Within several decades, Heraclius completed a holy war against the Persians, taking their capital and having a Sassanid monarch assassinated. Yet Heraclius lived to see his spectacular success undone by the Muslim conquests of Syria, three Palaestina provincesEgypt, and North Africa which was considerably facilitated by religious disunity and the proliferation of heretical movements (notably Monophysitism and Nestorianism) in the areas converted to Islam.

Although Heraclius’s successors managed to salvage Constantinople from two Arab sieges (in 674–77 and 717), the empire of the 8th and early 9th century was rocked by the great Iconoclastic Controversy, punctuated by dynastic struggles between various factions at court. The Bulgar and Slavic tribes profited from these disorders and invaded IllyriaThrace and even Greece. After the decisive victory at Ongala in 680 the armies of the Bulgars and Slavs advanced to the south of the Balkan mountains, defeating again the Byzantines who were then forced to sign a humiliating peace treaty which acknowledged the establishment of the First Bulgarian Empireon the borders of the Empire.

To counter these threats a new system of administration was introduced. The regional civil and military administration were combined in the hands of a general, or strategos. A theme, which formerly denoted a subdivision of the Byzantine army, came to refer to a region governed by a strategos. The reform led to the emergence of great landed families which controlled the regional military and often pressed their claims to the throne (see Bardas Phocas and Bardas Sklerus for characteristic examples).

Christ crowning Constantine VII
ivory plaque, ca. 945

By the early 8th century, notwithstanding the shrinking territory of the empire, Constantinople remained the largest and the wealthiest city of the entire world, comparable only to Sassanid Ctesiphon, and later Abassid Baghdad. The population of the imperial capital fluctuated between 300,000 and 400,000 as the emperors undertook measures to restrain its growth. The only other large Christian cities were Rome (50,000) and Salonika (30,000).[21] Even before the 8th century was out, the Farmer’s Law signalled the resurrection of agricultural technologies in the Roman Empire. As the 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica noted, “the technological base of Byzantine society was more advanced than that of contemporary western Europe: iron tools could be found in the villages; water mills dotted the landscape; and field-sown beans provided a diet rich in protein”.[22]

The ascension of the Macedonian dynasty in 867 marked the end of the period of political and religious turmoil and introduced a new golden age of the empire. While the talented generals such as Nicephorus Phocas expanded the frontiers, the Macedonian emperors (such as Leo the Wise and Constantine VII) presided over the cultural flowering in Constantinople, known as the Macedonian Renaissance. The enlightened Macedonian rulers scorned the rulers of Western Europe as illiterate barbarians and maintained a nominal claim to rule over the West. Although this fiction had been exploded with the coronation of Charlemagne in Rome (800), the Byzantine rulers did not treat their Western counterparts as equals. Generally, they had little interest in political and economic developments in the barbarian (from their point of view) West.

Against this economic background the culture and the imperial traditions of the Eastern Roman Empire attracted its northern neighbours—Slavs, Bulgars, and Khazars—to Constantinople, in search of either pillage or enlightenment. The movement of the Germanic tribes to the south triggered the great migration of the Slavs, who occupied the vacated territories. In the 7th century, they moved westward to the Elbe, southward to the Danube and eastward to the Dnieper. By the 9th century, the Slavs had expanded into sparsely inhabited territories to the south and east from these natural frontiers, peacefully assimilating the indigenous Illyrian and Finno-Ugricpopulations.

Rise of Islam

632–750

Europe around 650[unreliable source?]

From the 7th century Byzantine history was greatly affected by the rise of Islam and the Caliphates. Muslim Arabs first invaded historically Roman territory under Abū Bakr, first Caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, who entered Roman Syria and Roman Mesopotamia. The Byzantines and neighbouring Persian Sasanids had been severely weakened by a long succession of Byzantine–Sasanian wars, especially the climactic Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628. Under Umar, the second Caliph, the Muslims decisively conquered Syria and Mesopotamia, as well as Roman PalestineRoman Egypt, parts of Asia Minor and Roman North Africa, while they entirely toppled the Sasanids. In the mid 7th century AD, following the Muslim conquest of Persia, Islam penetrated into the Caucasus region, of which parts would later permanently become part of Russia.[23] This expansion of Islam continued under Umar’s successors and then the Umayyad Caliphate, which conquered the rest of Mediterranean North Africa and most of the Iberian Peninsula. Over the next centuries Muslim forces were able to take further European territory, including CyprusMaltaSeptimaniaCrete, and Sicily and parts of southern Italy.[24]

The Muslim conquest of Hispania began when the Moors (mostly Berbers and some Arabs) invaded the Christian Visigothic kingdom of Iberia in the year 711, under their Berber leader Tariq ibn Ziyad. They landed at Gibraltar on 30 April and worked their way northward. Tariq’s forces were joined the next year by those of his superior, Musa ibn Nusair. During the eight-year campaign most of the Iberian Peninsulawas brought under Muslim rule—except for small areas in the north-northwest (Asturias) and largely Basque regions in the Pyrenees. This territory, under the Arab name Al-Andalus, became part of the expanding Umayyad empire.

The unsuccessful second siege of Constantinople (717) weakened the Umayyad dynasty and reduced their prestige. After their success in overrunning Iberia, the conquerors moved northeast across the Pyrenees. They were defeated by the Frankish leader Charles Martelat the Battle of Poitiers in 732. The Umayyads were overthrown in 750 by the Abbāsids and most of the Umayyad clan were massacred.

A surviving Umayyad prince, Abd-ar-rahman I, escaped to Spain and founded a new Umayyad dynasty in the Emirate of Cordoba in 756. Charles Martel’s son Pippin the Short retook Narbonne, and his grandson Charlemagne established the Marca Hispanica across the Pyrenees in part of what today is Catalonia, reconquering Girona in 785 and Barcelona in 801. The Umayyads in Spain proclaimed themselves caliphs in 929.

Birth of the Latin West

700–850

The Sutton Hoo helmet, an Anglo-Saxon parade helmet from the 7th century

Due to a complex set of reasons,[which?] conditions in Western Europe began to improve after 700.[3][25] In that year, the two major powers in western Europe were the Franks in Gaul and the Lombards in Italy.[26] The Lombards had been thoroughly Romanized, and their kingdom was stable and well developed. The Franks, in contrast, were barely any different from their barbarian Germanic ancestors. Their kingdom was weak and divided.[27] Impossible to guess at the time, but by the end of the century, the Lombardic kingdom would be extinct, while the Frankish kingdom would have nearly reassembled the Western Roman Empire.[26]

Though much of Roman civilization north of the Po River had been wiped out in the years after the end of the Western Roman Empire, between the 5th and 8th centuries, new political and social infrastructure began to develop. Much of this was initially Germanic and pagan. Arian Christian missionaries had been spreading Arian Christianity throughout northern Europe, though by 700 the religion of northern Europeans was largely a mix of Germanic paganism, Christianized paganism, and Arian Christianity.[28] Catholic Christianity had barely started to spread in northern Europe by this time. Through the practice of simony, local princes typically auctioned off ecclesiastical offices, causing priests and bishops to function as though they were yet another noble under the patronage of the prince.[29] In contrast, a network of monasteries had sprung up as monks sought separation from the world. These monasteries remained independent from local princes, and as such constituted the “church” for most northern Europeans during this time. Being independent from local princes, they increasingly stood out as centres of learning, of scholarship, and as religious centres where individuals could receive spiritual or monetary assistance.[28]

The interaction between the culture of the newcomers, their warband loyalties, the remnants of classical culture, and Christian influences, produced a new model for society, based in part on feudal obligations. The centralized administrative systems of the Romans did not withstand the changes, and the institutional support for chattel slavery largely disappeared. The Anglo-Saxons in England had also started to convert from Anglo-Saxon polytheism after the arrival of Christian missionaries around the year 600.

Italy

The Lombard possessions in Italy: The Lombard Kingdom (Neustria, Austria and Tuscia) and the Lombard Duchies of Spoleto and Benevento

The Lombards, who first entered Italy in 568 under Alboin, carved out a state in the north, with its capital at Pavia. At first, they were unable to conquer the Exarchate of Ravenna, the Ducatus Romanus, and Calabriaand Apulia. The next two hundred years were occupied in trying to conquer these territories from the Byzantine Empire.

The Lombard state was relatively Romanized, at least when compared to the Germanic kingdoms in northern Europe. It was highly decentralized at first, with the territorial dukes having practical sovereignty in their duchies, especially in the southern duchies of Spoleto and Benevento. For a decade following the death of Cleph in 575, the Lombards did not even elect a king; this period is called the Rule of the Dukes. The first written legal code was composed in poor Latin in 643: the Edictum Rothari. It was primarily the codification of the oral legal tradition of the people.

The Lombard state was well-organized and stabilized by the end of the long reign of Liutprand (717–744), but its collapse was sudden. Unsupported by the dukes, King Desiderius was defeated and forced to surrender his kingdom to Charlemagne in 774. The Lombard kingdom ended and a period of Frankish rule was initiated. The Frankish king Pepin the Short had, by the Donation of Pepin, given the pope the “Papal States” and the territory north of that swath of papally-governed land was ruled primarily by Lombard and Frankish vassals of the Holy Roman Emperor until the rise of the city-states in the 11th and 12th centuries.

In the south, a period of chaos began. The duchy of Benevento maintained its sovereignty in the face of the pretensions of both the Western and Eastern Empires. In the 9th century, the Muslimsconquered Sicily. The cities on the Tyrrhenian Sea departed from Byzantine allegiance. Various states owing various nominal allegiances fought constantly over territory until events came to a head in the early 11th century with the coming of the Normans, who conquered the whole of the south by the end of the century.

Britain

Roman Britain was in a state of political and economic collapse at the time of the Roman departure c. 400. A series of settlements(traditionally referred to as an invasion) by Germanic peoples began in the early fifth century, and by the sixth century the island would consist of many small kingdoms engaged in ongoing warfare with each other. The Germanic kingdoms are now collectively referred to as Anglo-Saxons. Christianization began to take hold among the Anglo-Saxons in the sixth century, with 597 given as the traditional date for its large-scale adoption.

The Gokstad ship, a 9th-century Viking longship, excavated in 1882. Viking Ship Museum, Oslo, Norway

Western Britain (Wales), eastern and northern Scotland (Pictland) and the Scottish highlands and isles continued their separate evolution. The Irish descended and Irish-influenced people of western Scotland were Christian from the fifth century onward, the Picts adopted Christianity in the sixth century under the influence of Columba, and the Welsh had been Christian since the Roman era.

Northumbria was the pre-eminent power c. 600–700, absorbing several weaker Anglo-Saxon and Brythonickingdoms, while Mercia held a similar status c. 700–800. Wessexwould absorb all of the kingdoms in the south, both Anglo-Saxon and Briton. In Wales consolidation of power would not begin until the ninth century under the descendants of Merfyn Frych of Gwynedd, establishing a hierarchy that would last until the Norman invasion of Wales in 1081.

The first Viking raids on Britain began before 800, increasing in scope and destructiveness over time. In 865 a large, well-organized DanishViking army (called the Great Heathen Army) attempted a conquest, breaking or diminishing Anglo-Saxon power everywhere but in Wessex. Under the leadership of Alfred the Great and his descendants, Wessex would at first survive, then coexist with, and eventually conquer the Danes. It would then establish the Kingdom of England and rule until the establishment of an Anglo-Danish kingdom under Cnut, and then again until the Norman Invasion of 1066.

Viking raids and invasion were no less dramatic for the north. Their defeat of the Picts in 839 led to a lasting Norse heritage in northernmost Scotland, and it led to the combination of the Picts and Gaels under the House of Alpin, which became the Kingdom of Alba, the predecessor of the Kingdom of Scotland. The Vikings combined with the Gaels of the Hebrides to become the Gall-Gaidel and establish the Kingdom of the Isles.

Frankish Empire

Charlemagne’s Coronation
On 25 December 800, Charlemagne was crowned emperor by Pope Leo IIICoronation of Charlemagne, Grandes Chroniques de France, Jean Fouquet, Tours, c. 1455-1460

The Merovingians established themselves in the power vacuum of the former Roman provinces in Gaul, and Clovis I converted to Christianity following his victory over the Alemanni at the Battle of Tolbiac (496), laying the foundation of the Frankish Empire, the dominant state of early medieval Western Christendom. The Frankish kingdom grew through a complex development of conquest, patronage, and alliance building. Due to salic custom, inheritance rights were absolute, and all land was divided equally among the sons of a dead land holder.[30] This meant that, when the king granted a prince land in reward for service, that prince and all of his descendants had an irrevocable right to that land that no future king could undo. Likewise, those princes (and their sons) could sublet their land to their own vassals, who could in turn sublet the land to lower sub-vassals.[30] This all had the effect of weakening the power of the king as his kingdom grew, since the result was that the land became controlled by not just by more princes and vassals, but by multiple layers of vassals. This also allowed his nobles to attempt to build their own power base, though given the strict salic tradition of hereditary kingship, few would ever consider overthrowing the king.[30]

This increasingly absurd arrangement was highlighted by Charles Martel, who as Mayor of the Palace was effectively the strongest prince in the kingdom.[31] His accomplishments were highlighted, not just by his famous defeat of invading Muslims at the Battle of Tours, which is typically considered the battle that saved Europe from Muslim conquest, but by the fact that he greatly expanded Frankish influence. It was under his patronage that Saint Boniface expanded Frankish influence into Germany by rebuilding the German church, with the result that, within a century, the German church was the strongest church in western Europe.[31] Yet despite this, Charles Martel refused to overthrow the Frankish king. His son, Pepin the Short, inherited his power, and used it to further expand Frankish influence. Unlike his father, however, Pepin decided to seize the Frankish kingship. Given how strongly Frankish culture held to its principle of inheritance, few would support him if he attempted to overthrow the king.[32] Instead, he sought the assistance of Pope Zachary, who was himself newly vulnerable due to fallout with the Byzantine Emperor over the Iconoclastic Controversy. Pepin agreed to support the pope and to give him land (the Donation of Pepin, which created the Papal States) in exchange for being consecrated as the new Frankish king. Given that Pepin’s claim to the kingship was now based on an authority higher than Frankish custom, no resistance was offered to Pepin.[32]With this, the Merovingian line of kings ended, and the Carolingian line began.

Pepin’s son Charlemagne continued in the footsteps of his father and grandfather. He further expanded and consolidated the Frankish kingdom (now commonly called the Carolingian Empire). His reign also saw a cultural rebirth, commonly called the Carolingian Renaissance. Though the exact reasons are unclear, Charlemagne was crowned “Roman Emperor” by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day, 800. Upon Charlemagne’s death, his empire had united much of modern-day France, western Germany and northern Italy. The years after his death illustrated how Germanic his empire remained.[32]Rather than an orderly succession, his empire was divided in accordance with Frankish inheritance custom, which resulted in instability that plagued his empire until the last king of a united empire, Charles the Fat, died in 887, which resulted in a permanent split of the empire into West Francia and East Francia. West Francia would be ruled by Carolingians until 987 and East Francia until 911, after which time the partition of the empire into France and Germany was complete.[32]

Feudalism

Around 800 there was a return to systematic agriculture in the form of the open field, or strip, system. A manor would have several fields, each subdivided into 1-acre (4,000 m2) strips of land. An acre measured one “furlong” of 220 yards by one “chain” of 22 yards (that is, about 200 m by 20 m). A furlong (from “furrow long”) was considered to be the distance an ox could plough before taking a rest; the strip shape of the acre field also reflected the difficulty in turning early heavy ploughs. In the idealized form of the system, each family got thirty such strips of land. The three-field system of crop rotationwas first developed in the 9th century: wheat or rye was planted in one field, the second field had a nitrogen-fixing crop, and the third was fallow.[33]

Compared to the earlier two-field system, a three-field system allows for significantly more land to be put under cultivation. Even more important, the system allows for two harvests a year, reducing the risk that a single crop failure will lead to famine. Three-field agriculture creates a surplus of oats that can be used to feed horses. This surplus would allow the replacement of the ox by the horse after the introduction of the padded horse collar in the 12th century. Because the system required a major rearrangement of real estate and of the social order, it took until the 11th century before it came into general use. The heavy wheeled plough was introduced in the late 10th century. It required greater animal power and promoted the use of teams of oxen. Illuminated manuscripts depict two-wheeled ploughs with both a mouldboard, or curved metal ploughshare, and a coulter, a vertical blade in front of the ploughshare. The Romans had used light, wheel-less ploughs with flat iron shares that often proved unequal to the heavy soils of northern Europe.

The return to systemic agriculture coincided with the introduction of a new social system called feudalism. This system featured a hierarchy of reciprocal obligations. Each man was bound to serve his superior in return for the latter’s protection. This made for confusion of territorial sovereignty since allegiances were subject to change over time and were sometimes mutually contradictory. Feudalism allowed the state to provide a degree of public safety despite the continued absence of bureaucracy and written records. Even land ownership disputes were decided based solely on oral testimony. Territoriality was reduced to a network of personal allegiances.

Viking Age[edit]

Scandinavian settlements and raiding territory. Note : yellow in England and southern Italy covers the Viking expansion from Normandy, called by the name of Norman


  •      8th century homeland
  •      9th century expansion
  •      10th century expansion

Viking raiding regions

The Viking Age spans the period roughly between the late 8th and mid-11th centuries in Scandinavia and Britain, following the Germanic Iron Age (and the Vendel Age in Sweden). During this period, the Vikings, Scandinavian warriors and traders raided and explored most parts of Europe, south-western Asia, northern Africa, and north-eastern North America.

With the means to travel (longships and open water), desire for goods led Scandinavian traders to explore and develop extensive trading partnerships in new territories. Some of the most important trading ports during the period include both existing and ancient cities such as AarhusRibeHedebyVinetaTrusoKaupangBirkaBordeauxYorkDublin, and Aldeigjuborg.

Viking raiding expeditions were separate from, though coexisted with, regular trading expeditions. Apart from exploring Europe via its oceans and rivers, with the aid of their advanced navigational skills, they extended their trading routes across vast parts of the continent. They also engaged in warfare, looting and enslaving numerous Christian communities of Medieval Europe for centuries, contributing to the development of feudal systems in Europe.

Eastern Europe

600–1000

The Early Middle Ages marked the beginning of the cultural distinctions between Western and Eastern Europe north of the Mediterranean. Influence from the Byzantine Empire impacted the Christianization and hence almost every aspect of the cultural and political development of the East from the preeminence of Caesaropapism and Eastern Christianity to the spread of the Cyrillic alphabet. The turmoil of the so-called Barbarian invasions in the beginning of the period gradually gave way to more stabilized societies and states as the origins of contemporary Eastern Europe began to take shape during the High Middle Ages.

Magyar campaigns in the 10th century


Magyar region


Most European nations were praying for mercy: “Sagittis hungarorum libera nos, Domine” – “Lord save us from the arrows of Hungarians”[citation needed]

Turkic and Iranian invaders from Central Asia pressured the agricultural populations both in the Byzantine Balkans and in Central Europe creating a number of successor states in the Pontic steppes. After the dissolution of the Hunnic Empire, the Western Turkic and Avar Khaganates dominated territories from Pannonia to the Caspian Sea before replaced by the short lived Old Great Bulgaria and the more successful Khazar Khaganate north of the Black Sea and the Magyars in Central Europe.

The Khazars were a nomadic Turkic people who managed to develop a multiethnic commercial state which owed its success to the control of much of the waterway trade between Europe and Central Asia. The Khazars also exacted tribute from the AlaniMagyars, various Slavictribes, the Crimean Goths, and the Greeks of Crimea. Through a network of Jewish itinerant merchants, or Radhanites, they were in contact with the trade emporia of India and Spain.

Once they found themselves confronted by Arab expansionism, the Khazars pragmatically allied themselves with Constantinople and clashed with the Caliphate. Despite initial setbacks, they managed to recover Derbent and eventually penetrated as far south as Caucasian IberiaCaucasian Albania and Armenia. In doing so, they effectively blocked the northward expansion of Islam into Eastern Europe even before khan Tervel achieved the same at the Second Arab Siege of Constantinople and several decades before the Battle of Tours in Western Europe. Islam eventually penetrated into Eastern Europe in the 920s when Volga Bulgaria exploited the decline of Khazar power in the region to adopt Islam from the Baghdad missionaries. The state religion of Khazaria, Judaism, disappeared as a political force with the fall of Khazaria, while Islam of Volga Bulgaria has survived in the region up to the present.

In the beginning of the period the Slavic tribes started to expand aggressively into Byzantine possessions on the Balkans. The first attested Slavic polities were Serbia and Great Moravia, the latter of which emerged under the aegis of the Frankish Empire in the early 9th century. Great Moravia was ultimately overrun by the Magyars, who invaded the Pannonian Basin around 896. The Slavic state became a stage for confrontation between the Christian missionaries from Constantinople and Rome. Although West SlavsCroats and Sloveneseventually acknowledged Roman ecclesiastical authority, the clergy of Constantinople succeeded in converting to Eastern Christianity two of the largest states of early medieval Europe, Bulgaria around 864, and Kievan Rus’ circa 990.

Bulgaria[edit]

Ceramic icon of St Theodorefrom around 900, found in Preslav, Bulgarian capital from 893–972

In 632 the Bulgars established the khanate of Old Great Bulgaria under the leadership of Kubrat. The Khazars managed to oust the Bulgars from Southern Ukraine into lands along middle Volga (Volga Bulgaria) and along lower Danube(Danube Bulgaria).

In 681 the Bulgars founded a powerful and ethnically diverse state that played a defining role in the history of early medieval Southeastern Europe. Bulgaria withstood the pressure from Pontic steppe tribes like the PechenegsKhazars, and Cumans, and in 806 destroyed the Avar Khanate. The Danube Bulgars were quickly slavicized and, despite constant campaigning against Constantinople, accepted Christianity from the Byzantine Empire. Through the efforts of missionaries Saint Cyril and Saint Methodius,[34] the Bulgarian Glagolitic and Cyrillic alphabets were developed in the capital Preslav and a vernacular dialect, now known as Old Bulgarian or Old Church Slavonic, was established as the language of books and liturgy among Orthodox Christian Slavs.

After the adoption of Christianity in 864, Bulgaria became a cultural and spiritual hub of the Eastern Orthodox Slavic world. The Cyrillic script was developed by Bulgarian scholar Clement of Ohrid in 885-886 and was afterwards introduced to Serbia and Kievan Rus’. Literature, art, and architecture were thriving with the establishment of the Preslav and Ohrid Literary Schools along with the distinct Preslav Ceramics School. In 927 the Bulgarian Orthodox Church was the first European national Church to gain independence with its own Patriarch while conducting services in the vernacular Old Church Slavonic.

Under Simeon I (893–927), the state was the largest and one of the most powerful political entities of Europe, and it consistently threatened the existence of the Byzantine empire. From the middle of the 10th century Bulgaria was in decline as it entered a social and spiritual turmoil. It was in part due to Simeon’s devastating wars, but was also exacerbated by a series of successful Byzantine military campaigns. Bulgaria was conquered after a long resistance in 1018.

Kievan Rus’

Led by a Varangian dynasty, the Kievan Rus’ controlled the routes connecting Northern Europe to Byzantium and to the Orient (for example: the Volga trade route). The Kievan state began with the rule (882–912) of Prince Oleg, who extended his control from Novgorodsouthwards along the Dnieper river valley in order to protect trade from Khazar incursions from the east and moved his capital to the more strategic KievSviatoslav I (died 972) achieved the first major expansion of Kievan Rus’ territorial control, fighting a war of conquest against the Khazar Empire and inflicting a serious blow on Bulgaria. A Rus’ attack (967 or 968), instigated by the Byzantines, led to the collapse of the Bulgarian state and the occupation of the east of the country by the Rus’. An ensuing direct military confrontation between the Rus’ and Byzantium (970-971) ended with a Byzantine victory(971). The Rus’ withdrew and the Byzantine Empire incorporated eastern Bulgaria. Both before and after their conversion to Christianity(conventionally dated 988 under Vladimir I of Kiev—known as Vladimir the Great), the Rus’ also embarked on predatory military campaigns against the Byzantine Empire, some of which resulted in trade treaties. The importance of Russo-Byzantine relations to Constantinople was highlighted by the fact that Vladimir I of Kiev, son of Svyatoslav I, became the only foreigner to marry (989) a Byzantine princess of the Macedonian dynasty (which ruled the Eastern Roman Empire from 867 to 1056), a singular honour sought in vain by many other rulers.

Transmission of learning

Abbey of Santo Domingo de Silos


In the Early Middle Ages, cultural life was concentrated at monasteries.

With the end of the Western Roman Empire and with urban centres in decline, literacy and learning decreased in the West. This continued a pattern that had been underway since the 3rd century.[35] Much learning under the Roman Empire was in Greek, and with the re-emergence of the wall between east and west, little eastern learning continued in the west. Much of the Greek literary corpus remained in Greek, and few in the west could speak or read Greek.[35] Due to the demographic displacement that accompanied the end of the western Roman Empire, by this point most western Europeans were descendants of non-literate barbarians rather than literate Romans. In this sense, education was not lost so much as it had yet to be acquired.[35]

Education did ultimately continue, and was centred in the monasteries and cathedrals. A “Renaissance” of classical education would appear in Carolingian Empire in the 8th century. In the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium), learning (in the sense of formal education involving literature) was maintained at a higher level than in the West. The classical education system, which would persist for hundreds of years, emphasized grammar, Latin, Greek, and rhetoric. Pupils read and reread classic works and wrote essays imitating their style. By the 4th century, this education system was Christianized. In De Doctrina Christiana (started 396, completed 426), Augustine explained how classical education fits into the Christian worldview: Christianity is a religion of the book, so Christians must be literate. Tertullian was more skeptical of the value of classical learning, asking “What indeed has Athens to do with Jerusalem?”[36]

De-urbanization reduced the scope of education, and by the 6th century teaching and learning moved to monastic and cathedral schools, with the study of biblical texts at the centre of education.[37]Education of the laity continued with little interruption in Italy, Spain, and the southern part of Gaul, where Roman influences were more long-lasting. In the 7th century, however, learning expanded in Ireland and the Celtic lands, where Latin was a foreign language and Latin texts were eagerly studied and taught.[38]

Science

In the ancient world, Greek was the primary language of science. Advanced scientific research and teaching was mainly carried on in the Hellenistic side of the Roman empire, and in Greek. Late Roman attempts to translate Greek writings into Latin had limited success.[39]As the knowledge of Greek declined, the Latin West found itself cut off from some of its Greek philosophical and scientific roots. For a time, Latin-speakers who wanted to learn about science had access to only a couple of books by Boethius (c. 470–524) that summarized Greek handbooks by Nicomachus of GerasaSaint Isidore of Sevilleproduced a Latin encyclopedia in 630. Private libraries would have existed, and monasteries would also keep various kinds of texts.

The study of nature was pursued more for practical reasons than as an abstract inquiry: the need to care for the sick led to the study of medicine and of ancient texts on drugs;[40] the need for monks to determine the proper time to pray led them to study the motion of the stars;[41] and the need to compute the date of Easter led them to study and teach mathematics and the motions of the Sun and Moon.[42][43]

Carolingian Renaissance

In the late 8th century, there was renewed interest in Classical Antiquity as part of the Carolingian RenaissanceCharlemagne carried out a reform in education. The English monk Alcuin of York elaborated a project of scholarly development aimed at resuscitating classical knowledge by establishing programs of study based upon the seven liberal arts: the trivium, or literary education (grammarrhetoric, and dialectic), and the quadrivium, or scientific education (arithmeticgeometryastronomy, and music). From 787 on, decrees began to circulate recommending the restoration of old schools and the founding of new ones across the empire.

Institutionally, these new schools were either under the responsibility of a monastery (monastic schools), a cathedral, or a noble court. The teaching of dialectic (a discipline that corresponds to today’s logic) was responsible for the increase in the interest in speculative inquiry; from this interest would follow the rise of the Scholastic tradition of Christian philosophy. In the 12th and 13th centuries, many of those schools founded under the auspices of Charlemagne, especially cathedral schools, would become universities.

Byzantium’s golden age

Miniature from the Paris Psalter


Byzantium in the 10th century experienced a wide-scale cultural revival.

Byzantium’s great intellectual achievement was the Corpus Juris Civilis (“Body of Civil Law”), a massive compilation of Roman lawmade under Justinian (r. 528-65). The work includes a section called the Digesta which abstracts the principles of Roman law in such a way that they can be applied to any situation. The level of literacy was considerably higher in the Byzantine Empire than in the Latin West. Elementary education was much more widely available, sometimes even in the countryside. Secondary schools still taught the Iliad and other classics.

As for higher education, the Neoplatonic Academy in Athens was closed in 526. There was also a school in Alexandria which remained open until the Arab conquest (640). The University of Constantinople, founded by Emperor Theodosius II (425), seems to have dissolved around this time. It was refounded by Emperor Michael III in 849. Higher education in this period focused on rhetoric, although Aristotle‘s logic was covered in simple outline. Under the Macedonian dynasty (867–1056), Byzantium enjoyed a golden age and a revival of classical learning. There was little original research, but many lexicons, anthologies, encyclopedias, and commentaries.

Islamic learning

In the course of the 11th century, Islam’s scientific knowledge began to reach Western Europe, via Islamic Spain. The works of Euclid and Archimedes, lost in the West, were translated from Arabic to Latin in Spain. The modern Hindu-Arabic numeral system, including a notation for zero, were developed by Hindu mathematicians in the 5th and 6th centuries. Muslim mathematicians learned of it in the 7th century and added a notation for decimal fractions in the 9th and 10th centuries. Around 1000, Gerbert of Aurillac (later Pope Sylvester II) made an abacus with counters engraved with Arabic numerals. A treatise by Al-Khwārizmī on how to perform calculations with these numerals was translated into Latin in Spain in the 12th century.

Monasteries[edit]

Monasteries were targeted in the eighth and ninth centuries by Vikingswho invaded the coasts of northern Europe. They were targeted not only because they stored books but also precious objects that were looted by invaders. In the earliest monasteries, there were no special rooms set aside as a library, but from the sixth century onwards libraries became an essential aspect of monastic life in the Western Europe. The Benedictines placed books in the care of a librarian who supervised their use. In some monastic reading rooms, valuable books would be chained to shelves, but there were also lending sections as well. Copying was also another important aspect of monastic libraries, this was undertaken by resident or visiting monks and took place in the scriptorium. In the Byzantine world, religious houses rarely maintained their own copying centres. Instead they acquired donations from wealthy donors. In the tenth century, the largest collection in the Byzantine world was found in the monasteries of Mount Athos(modern-day Greece), which accumulated over 10,000 books. Scholars travelled from one monastery to another in search of the texts they wished to study. Travelling monks were often given funds to buy books, and certain monasteries which held a reputation for intellectual activities welcomed travelling monks who came to copy manuscripts for their own libraries. One of these was the monastery of Bobbio in Italy, which was founded by the Irish abbot St. Columba in 614, and by the ninth century boasted a catalogue of 666 manuscripts, including religious works, classical texts, histories and mathematical treatises.[44]

Christianity West and East

Sacramentarium Gelasianum.


Frontispiece of Incipit from the Vatican manuscript

St Boniface – Baptism and Martyrdom.

From the early Christians, early medieval Christians inherited a church united by major creeds, a stable Biblical canon, and a well-developed philosophical tradition. The history of medieval Christianity traces Christianity during the Middle Ages—the period after the fall of the Roman Empire until the Protestant Reformation. The institutional structure of Christianity in the west during this period is different from what it would become later in the Middle Ages. As opposed to the later church, the church of the early Middle Ages consisted primarily of the monasteries.[45]The practice of simony has caused the ecclesiastical offices to become the property of local princes, and as such the monasteries constituted the only church institution independent of the local princes. In addition, the papacy was relatively weak, and its power was mostly confined to central Italy.[45] Individualized religious practice was uncommon, as it typically required membership in a religious order, such as the Order of Saint Benedict.[45] Religious orders would not proliferate until the high Middle Ages. For the typical Christian at this time, religious participation was largely confined to occasionally receiving mass from wandering monks. Few would be lucky enough to receive this as often as once a month.[45] By the end of this period, individual practice of religion was becoming more common, as monasteries started to transform into something approximating modern churches, where some monks might even give occasional sermons.[45]

During the early Middle Ages, the divide between Eastern and Western Christianity widened, paving the way for the East-West Schism in the 11th century. In the West, the power of the Bishop of Rome expanded. In 607, Boniface III became the first Bishop of Rome to use the title Pope[citation needed]. Pope Gregory the Great used his office as a temporal power, expanded Rome’s missionary efforts to the British Isles, and laid the foundations for the expansion of monastic orders. Roman church traditions and practices gradually replaced local variants, including Celtic Christianity in Great Britain and Ireland. Various barbarian tribes went from raiding and pillaging the island to invading and settling. They were entirely pagan, having never been part of the Empire, though they experienced Christian influence from the surrounding peoples, such as those who were converted by the mission of St. Augustine of Canterbury, sent by Pope Gregory the Great. In the East, the conquests of Islam reduced the power of the Greek-speaking patriarchates.

Christianization of the West

The Catholic Church, the only centralized institution to survive the fall of the Western Roman Empire intact, was the sole unifying cultural influence in the West, preserving Latin learning, maintaining the art of writing, and preserving a centralized administration through its network of bishops ordained in succession. The Early Middle Ages are characterized by the urban control of bishops and the territorial control exercised by dukes and counts. The rise of urban communes marked the beginning of the High Middle Ages.

The Christianization of Germanic tribes began in the 4th century with the Goths and continued throughout the Early Middle Ages, led in the 6th to 7th centuries by the Hiberno-Scottish mission and replaced in the 8th to 9th centuries by the Anglo-Saxon mission, with Anglo-Saxons like Alcuin playing an important role in the Carolingian renaissanceSaint Boniface, the Apostle of the Germans, propagated Christianity in the Frankish Empire during the 8th century. He helped shape Western Christianity, and many of the dioceses he proposed remain until today. After his martyrdom, he was quickly hailed as a saint. By 1000, even Iceland had become Christian, leaving only more remote parts of Europe (Scandinavia, the Baltic, and Finno-Ugriclands) to be Christianized during the High Middle Ages.

Holy Roman Empire

10th century

The Holy Roman Empire
HRE in era from Emperor Otto I to Konrad II included present-day: Germany, the Czech Republic, Austria, Slovenia, northern half of Italy, Switzerland, (south)eastern France, Belgium and the Netherlands


Imperial region

Other regions

Listless and often ill, Carolingian Emperor Charles the Fat provoked an uprising, led by his nephew Arnulf of Carinthia, which resulted in the division of the empire in 887 into the kingdoms of France, Germany, and (northern) Italy. Taking advantage of the weakness of the German government, the Magyars had established themselves in the Alföld, or Hungarian grasslands, and began raiding across Germany, Italy, and even France. The German nobles elected Henry the Fowler, duke of Saxony, as their king at a Reichstag, or national assembly, in Fritzlar in 919. Henry’s power was only marginally greater than that of the other leaders of the stem duchies, which were the feudal expression of the former German tribes.

Henry’s son King Otto I (r. 936–973) was able to defeat a revolt of the dukes supported by French King Louis IV (939). In 951, Otto marched into Italy and married the widowed Queen Adelaide, named himself king of the Lombards, and received homage from Berengar of Ivrea, king of Italy (r. 950-52). Otto named his relatives the new leaders of the stem duchies, but this approach did not completely solve the problem of disloyalty. His son Liudolf, duke of Swabia, revolted and welcomed the Magyars into Germany (953). At Lechfeld, near Augsburg in Bavaria, Otto caught up with the Magyars while they were enjoying a razzia and achieved a signal victory in 955. The Magyars ceased living on plunder, and their leaders created a Christian kingdom called Hungary (1000).

Founding of the Holy Roman Empire

The defeat of the Magyars greatly enhanced Otto’s prestige. He marched into Italy again and was crowned emperor (imperator augustus) by Pope John XII in Rome (962), an event that historians count as the founding of the Holy Roman Empire, although the term was not used until much later. The Ottonian state is also considered the first Reich, or German Empire. Otto used the imperial title without attaching it to any territory. He and later emperors thought of themselves as part of a continuous line of emperors that begins with Charlemagne. (Several of these “emperors” were simply local Italian magnates who bullied the pope into crowning them.) Otto deposed John XII for conspiring against him with Berengar, and he named Pope Leo VIII to replace him (963). Berengar was captured and taken to Germany. John was able to reverse the deposition after Otto left, but he died in the arms of his mistress soon afterwards.

Besides founding the German Empire, Otto’s achievements include the creation of the “Ottonian church system,” in which the clergy (the only literate section of the population) assumed the duties of an imperial civil service. He raised the papacy out of the muck of Rome’s local gangster politics, assured that the position was competently filled, and gave it a dignity that allowed it to assume leadership of an international church.

Europe in 1000 CE

Speculation that the world would end in the year 1000 was confined to a few uneasy French monks.[46] Ordinary clerks used regnal years, i.e. the 4th year of the reign of Robert II (the Pious) of France. The use of the modern “anno domini” system of dating was confined to the Venerable Bede and other chroniclers of universal history.

Western Europe remained less developed compared to the Islamic world, with its vast network of caravan trade, or China, at this time the world’s most populous empire under the Song Dynasty. Constantinople had a population of about 300,000, but Rome had a mere 35,000 and Paris 20,000.[47][48] By contrast, Córdoba, in Islamic Spain, at this time the world’s largest city contained 450,000 inhabitants. The Vikings had a trade network in northern Europe, including a route connecting the Baltic to Constantinople through Russia, as did the Radhanites.

St. Michael’s Church, Hildesheim, 1010s. Ottonian architecture draws its inspiration from Carolingian and Byzantine architecture.

With nearly the entire nation freshly ravaged by the Vikings, England was in a desperate state. The long-suffering English later responded with a massacre of Danish settlers in 1002, leading to a round of reprisals and finally to Danish rule (1013), though England regained independence shortly after. But Christianization made rapid progress and proved itself the long-term solution to the problem of barbarian raiding. The territories of Scandinavia were soon to be fully Christianized Kingdoms: Denmark in the 10th century, Norway in the 11th, and Sweden, the country with the least raiding activity, in the 12th. Kievan Rus, recently converted to Orthodox Christianity, flourished as the largest state in Europe. Iceland and Hungary were both declared Christian about 1000 CE.

In Europe, a formalized institution of marriage was established. The proscribed degree of the degree of consanguinity varied, but the custom made marriages annullable by application to the Pope.[49]North of Italy, where masonry construction was never extinguished, stone construction was replacing timber in important structures. Deforestation of the densely wooded continent was under way. The 10th century marked a return of urban life, with the Italian cities doubling in population. London, abandoned for many centuries, was again England’s main economic centre by 1000. By 1000, Bruges and Ghent held regular trade fairs behind castle walls, a tentative return of economic life to western Europe.

In the culture of Europe, several features surfaced soon after 1000 that mark the end of the Early Middle Ages: the rise of the medieval communes, the reawakening of city life, and the appearance of the burgher class, the founding of the first universities, the rediscovery of Roman law, and the beginnings of vernacular literature.

In 1000, the papacy was firmly under the control of German Emperor Otto III, or “emperor of the world” as he styled himself. But later church reforms enhanced its independence and prestige: the Cluniac movement, the building of the first great Transalpine stone cathedrals and the collation of the mass of accumulated decretals into a formulated canon law.

Middle East

Rise of Islam

Consult particular article for details

The Islamic Prophet Muhammad[50]preaching

Rise of Islam
Arab expansion in the 7th century

  •      Area I : Muhammad
  •      Area II : Abu Bakr
  •      Area III : Omar
  •      Area IV : Uthman
The 10th-century Grand Mosque of Cordoba
(Andalusian cityCórdoba, Spain)


The site of the Grand Mosque was originally a pagan temple, then a Visigothic Christian church, before the Umayyad Moors at first converted the building into a mosque and then built a new mosque on the site.

The rise of Islam begins around the time Muhammadand his followers took flight, the Hijra, to the city of Medina. Muhammad spent his last ten years in a series of battles to conquer the Arabian region. From 622 to 632, Muhammad as the leader of a Muslim community in Medina was engaged in a state of war with the Meccans. In the proceeding decades, the area of Basra was conquered by the Muslims. During the reign of Umar, the Muslim army found it a suitable place to construct a base. Later the area was settled and a mosque was erected. Madyanwas conquered and settled by Muslims, but the environment was considered harsh and the settlers moved to Kufa. Umar defeated the rebellion of several Arab tribes in a successful campaign, unifying the entire Arabian peninsula and giving it stability. Under Uthman‘s leadership, the empire, through the Muslim conquest of Persia, expanded into Fars in 650, some areas of Khorasan in 651, and the conquest of Armenia was begun in the 640s. In this time, the Islamic empire extended over the whole Sassanid Persian Empire and to more than two-thirds of the Eastern Roman Empire. The First Fitna, or the First Islamic Civil War, lasted for the entirety of Ali ibn Abi Talib‘s reign. After the recorded peace treaty with Hassan ibn Ali and the suppression of early Kharijites‘ disturbances, Muawiyah I acceded to the position of Caliph.

Islamic expansion

The Islamic expansion of the 7th and 8th centuries

  •   Muhammad’s conquests, 622–632
  •   Rashidun Caliphate, 632–661
  •   Umayyad Caliphate, 661–750

The Muslim conquests of the Eastern Roman Empire and Arab wars occurred between 634 and 750. Starting in 633, Muslims conquered Iraq. The Muslim conquest of Syriawould begin in 634 and would be complete by 638. The Muslim conquest of Egypt started in 639. Before the Muslim invasion of Egypt began, the Eastern Roman Empire had already lost the Levant and its Arab ally, the Ghassanid Kingdom, to the Muslims. The Muslims would bring Alexandria under control and the fall of Egypt would be complete by 642. Between 647 and 709, Muslims swept across North Africa and established their authority over that region.

The Transoxiana region was conquered by Qutayba ibn Muslimbetween 706 and 715 and loosely held by the Umayyads from 715 to 738. This conquest was consolidated by Nasr ibn Sayyar between 738 and 740. It was under the Umayyads from 740-748 and under the Abbasids after 748. Sindh, attacked in 664, would be subjugated by 712. Sindh became the easternmost province of the Umayyad. The Umayyad conquest of Hispania (Visigothic Spain) would begin in 711 and end by 718. The Moors, under Al-Samh ibn Malik, swept up the Iberian peninsula and by 719 overran Septimania; the area would fall under their full control in 720. With the Islamic conquest of Persia, the Muslim subjugation of the Caucasus would take place between 711 and 750. The end of the sudden Islamic Caliphate expansion ended around this time. The final Islamic dominion eroded the areas of the Iron Age Roman Empire in the Middle East and controlled strategic areas of the Mediterranean.

At the end of the 8th century, the former Western Roman Empire was decentralized and overwhelmingly rural. The Islamic conquest and rule of Sicily and Malta was a process which started in the 9th century. Islamic rule over Sicily was effective from 902, and the complete rule of the island lasted from 965 until 1061. The Islamic presence on the Italian Peninsula was ephemeral and limited mostly to semi-permanent soldier camps.

Caliphs and empire

The Abbasid Caliphate, ruled by the Abbasid dynasty of caliphs, was the third of the Islamic caliphates. Under the Abbasids, the Islamic Golden Age philosophers, scientists, and engineers of the Islamic world contributed enormously to technology, both by preserving earlier traditions and by adding their own inventions and innovations. Scientific and intellectual achievements blossomed in the period.

The Abbasids built their capital in Baghdad after replacing the Umayyad caliphs from all but the Iberian peninsula. The influence held by Muslim merchants over African-Arabian and Arabian-Asian trade routes was tremendous. As a result, Islamic civilization grew and expanded on the basis of its merchant economy, in contrast to their Christian, Indian, and Chinese peers who built societies from an agricultural landholding nobility.

The Abbasids flourished for two centuries but slowly went into decline with the rise to power of the Turkish army they had created, the Mamluks. Within 150 years of gaining control of Persia, the caliphs were forced to cede power to local dynastic emirs who only nominally acknowledged their authority. After the Abbasids lost their military dominance, the Samanids (or Samanid Empire) rose up in Central Asia. The Sunni Islam empire was a Tajik state and had a Zoroastrian theocratic nobility. It was the next native Persian dynasty after the collapse of the Sassanid Persian empire, caused by the Arab conquest.

European timelines

Beginning years

Dates

Ending years

Battle of Tours Al-Andalus Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor Alfred the Great Charlemagne Ardo

Dates

See also[edit]

References

Citations
  1. Jump up^ For more detail on the various starting and ending dates used by historians, see Middle Ages#Terminology and periodisation
  2. Jump up^ Hopkins, Keith Taxes and Trade in the Roman Empire (200 BC – AD 400)
  3. Jump up to:a b Berglund, B. E. (2003). “Human impact and climate changes—synchronous events and a causal link?” (PDF)Quaternary International105: 7–12. Bibcode:2003QuInt.105….7Bdoi:10.1016/S1040-6182(02)00144-1.
  4. Jump up^ Curry, Andrew, “Fall of Rome Recorded in Trees“, ScienceNOW, 13 January 2011.
  5. Jump up^ Heather, Peter, 1998, The Goths, pp. 51-93
  6. Jump up^ Eisenberg, Robert, “The Battle of Adrianople: A Reappraisal“, p. 112.
  7. Jump up^ Kerrigan, Michael (22 March 2017). “Battle of Adrianople”Encylopedia Britannica. Retrieved 25 April 2018.
  8. Jump up^ Gibbon, Edward, A History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, 1776.
  9. Jump up^ Excerpta Valesiana
  10. Jump up^ McEvedy 1992, op. cit.
  11. Jump up^ Scientists Identify Genes Critical to Transmission of Bubonic Plague Archived 2007-10-07 at the Wayback Machine.”, News Release, National Institutes of Health, July 18, 1996.
  12. Jump up^ The History of the Bubonic Plague Archived 2008-04-15 at the Wayback Machine..
  13. Jump up^ An Empire’s Epidemic.
  14. Jump up^ Hopkins DR (2002). The Greatest Killer: Smallpox in history. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-35168-8. Originally published as Princes and Peasants: Smallpox in History (1983), ISBN 0-226-35177-7
  15. Jump up^ How Smallpox Changed the World, By Heather Whipps, LiveScience, June 23, 2008
  16. Jump up^ Roman Empire Population
  17. Jump up^ Storey, Glenn R., “The population of ancient Rome“, Antiquity, December 1, 1997.
  18. Jump up^ Harbeck, Michaela; Seifert, Lisa; Hänsch, Stephanie; Wagner, David M.; Birdsell, Dawn; Parise, Katy L.; Wiechmann, Ingrid; Grupe, Gisela; Thomas, Astrid; Keim, P; Zöller, L; Bramanti, B; Riehm, JM; Scholz, HC (2013). Besansky, Nora J, ed. “Yersinia pestis DNA from Skeletal Remains from the 6th Century AD Reveals Insights into Justinianic Plague”PLoS Pathogens9 (5): e1003349. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003349PMC 3642051PMID 23658525.
  19. Jump up^ Bos, Kirsten; Stevens, Philip; Nieselt, Kay; Poinar, Hendrik N.; Dewitte, Sharon N.; Krause, Johannes (28 November 2012). Gilbert, M. Thomas P, ed. “Yersinia pestis: New Evidence for an Old Infection”PLoS ONE7 (11): e49803. Bibcode:2012PLoSO…749803Bdoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049803PMC 3509097PMID 23209603.
  20. Jump up^ 6th century mosaic from the Basilica of San Vitale in Ravenna
  21. Jump up^ City populations from Four Thousand Years of Urban Growth: An Historical Census Archived February 11, 2008, at the Wayback Machine. (1987, Edwin Mellon Press) by Tertius Chandler
  22. Jump up^ http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9239
  23. Jump up^ Hunter, Shireen (2004). Islam in Russia: The Politics of Identity and Security. Routledge. p. 3. ISBN 978-0765612830It is difficult to establish exactly when Islam first appeared in Russia because the lands that Islam penetrated early in its expansion were not part of Russia at the time, but were later incorporated into the expanding Russian Empire. Islam reached the Caucasus region in the middle of the seventh century as part of the Arab conquest of the Iranian Sassanid Empire.
  24. Jump up^ Kennedy, Hugh (1995). “The Muslims in Europe”. In McKitterick, Rosamund, The New Cambridge Medieval History: c. 500 – c. 700, pp. 249–272. Cambridge University Press. 052136292X.
  25. Jump up^ Cini Castagnoli, G.C., Bonino, G., Taricco, C. and Bernasconi, S.M. 2002. “Solar radiation variability in the last 1400 years recorded in the carbon isotope ratio of a Mediterranean sea core”, Advances in Space Research 29: 1989-1994.
  26. Jump up to:a b Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 102
  27. Jump up^ McKitterick, Rosamond (1995). The New Cambridge Medieval History: Volume 2, C.700-c.900. Cambridge University Press. pp. 87–90. ISBN 9780521362924.
  28. Jump up to:a b Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 147
  29. Jump up^ Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 148
  30. Jump up to:a b c Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 165
  31. Jump up to:a b Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 189
  32. Jump up to:a b c d Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 170
  33. Jump up^ Lienhard, John H. “No. 1318: Three-Field Rotation”Engines of Our Ingenuity. University of Houston.
  34. Jump up^ Barford, P. M. (2001). The Early Slavs. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press
  35. Jump up to:a b c Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 52
  36. Jump up^ “De praescriptione haereticorum, VII”.
  37. Jump up^ Pierre Riché, Education and Culture in the Barbarian West: From the Jeremy Marcelino II, (Columbia: Univ. of South Carolina Pr., 1976), pp. 100-129.
  38. Jump up^ Pierre Riché, Education and Culture in the Barbarian West: From the Sixth through the Eighth Century, (Columbia: Univ. of South Carolina Pr., 1976), pp. 307-323.
  39. Jump up^ William StahlRoman Science, (Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Pr.) 1962, see esp. pp. 120-133.
  40. Jump up^ Linda E. Voigts, “Anglo-Saxon Plant Remedies and the Anglo-Saxons,” Isis, 70(1979):250-268; reprinted in M. H. Shank, ed., The Scientific Enterprise in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pr., 2000).
  41. Jump up^ Stephen C. McCluskey, “Gregory of Tours, Monastic Timekeeping, and Early Christian Attitudes to Astronomy,” Isis, 81(1990):9-22; reprinted in M. H. Shank, ed., The Scientific Enterprise in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pr., 2000).
  42. Jump up^ Stephen C. McCluskey, Astronomies and Cultures in Early Medieval Europe, (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1998), pp. 149-57.
  43. Jump up^ Faith Wallis, “‘Number Mystique’ in Early Medieval Computus Texts,” pp. 179-99 in T. Koetsier and L. Bergmans, eds. Mathematics and the Divine: A Historical Study, (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005).
  44. Jump up^ Lyons, Martyn (2011). Books A Living History. United States: Getty Publications. pp. 15, 38–40. ISBN 9781606060834.
  45. Jump up to:a b c d e Cantor, Norman. “The Civilization of the Middle Ages”. p 153
  46. Jump up^ Cantor, 1993 Europe in 1050 p 235.
  47. Jump up^ Pasciuti, Daniel; Chase-Dunn, Christopher (21 May 2002). “Estimating The Population Sizes of Cities”Urbanization and Empire Formation Project. University of California, Riverside.
  48. Jump up^ http://sumbur.n-t.org/sg/ua/ddk.htm
  49. Jump up^ Dowling, Francis (9 May 1903). “Heredity with Especial Reference to Certain Eye Affections”The Cincinnati Lancet-Clinic89: 478.
  50. Jump up^ 17th-century Ottoman copy of an early 14th-century (Ilkhanate period) manuscript of Northwestern Iran or northern Iraq (the “Edinburgh codex). Illustration of Abū Rayhan al-Biruni ‘s al-Athar al-Baqiyah (الآثار الباقيةة, “The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries”)

Further reading

  • Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. I 1966. Michael M. Postan, et al., editors.
  • Norman F. Cantor, 1963. The Medieval World 300 to 1300, (New York: MacMillen Co.)
  • Marcia L. Colish, 1997. Medieval Foundations of the Western Intellectual Tradition: 400-1400. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press)
  • Georges Duby, 1974. The Early Growth of the European Economy: Warriors and Peasants from the Seventh to the Twelfth Century(New York: Cornell University Press) Howard B. Clark, translator.
  • Georges Duby, editor, 1988. A History of Private Life II: Revelations of the Medieval World (Harvard University Press)
  • Heinrich Fichtenau, (1957) 1978. The Carolingian Empire(University of Toronto) Peter Munz, translator.
  • Charles Freeman, 2003. The Closing of the Western Mind: The Rise of Faith and the Fall of Reason (London: William Heinemann)
  • Richard Hodges, 1982. Dark Age Economics: The Origins of Towns and Trade AD 600-1000 (New York: St Martin’s Press)
  • David Knowles, (1962) 1988. The Evolution of Medieval Thought(Random House)
  • Richard Krautheimer, 1980. Rome: Profile of a City 312-1308(Princeton University Press)
  • Robin Lane Fox, 1986. Pagans and Christians (New York: Knopf)
  • David C. Lindberg, 1992. The Beginnings of Western Science: 600 BC-1450 AD (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)
  • John Marenbon (1983) 1988.Early Medieval Philosophy (480-1150): An Introduction (London: Routledge)
  • Rosamond McKittrick, 1983 The Frankish Church Under the Carolingians (London: Longmans, Green)
  • Karl Frederick Morrison, 1969. Tradition and Authority in the Western Church, 300-1140 (Princeton University Press)
  • Pierre Riché, (1978) 1988. Daily Life in the Age of Charlemagne(Liverpool: Liverpool University Press)
  • Laury Sarti, “Perceiving War and the Military in Early Christian Gaul (ca. 400–700 A.D.)” (= Brill’s Series on the Early Middle Ages, 22), Leiden/Boston 2013, ISBN 978-9004-25618-7.
  • Richard Southern, 1953. The Making of the Middle Ages (Yale University Press)
  • Chris Wickham, 2005. Framing the early Middle Ages: Europe and the Mediterranean 400-800, Oxford University Press.
  • Early Medieval History page, Clio History Journal, Dickson College, Australian Capital Territory.
  • Glimpses of the dark ages: Or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth century. (1846). New-York: Leavitt, Trow & company

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Middle_Ages

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

 

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

Agris, France. About 350 BC Musée d’Angoulême This impressive piece of art was buried in a cave in Agris, western France. The entire cap, neck guard and cheek guards were all cluttered with lavish gold tendril and leaf design. Together with the gold, red coral inlays provide n effectual contrast. Kunst der Kelten, Historisches Museum Bern. Art of the Celts, Historic Museum of Bern.

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

Casque celte et gaulois d’apparat dit casque d’Agris; à coque en fer, recouverte de bronze décoré de feuilles d’or repoussées, rivetées (rivets en argent à tête sertie d’un fleuron d’or), argent et éléments décoratifs de corail sertis dans les alvéoles de certains motifs. il a été découvert à Agris, en Charente dans la grotte des Perrats en 1981 ; probablement fabriqué par des artisans de l’ouest de la gaule. C’est l’une des œuvres majeures de tout l’art gaulois. Il est conservé au musée d’Angoulême. Il est daté du second âge du fer, vers 5ème siècle avant Jésus-Christ. L’or provenait sans doute du Limousin ou du Périgord. Des motifs réalisés avec du fil d’or bouleté ornent la pièce mobile qui protégeaient la joue. Le motif principal du pare-joue représente un serpent cornu à longue tête, le monstre des enfers, attribut du dieu gaulois Cernunos. Ce casque n’a probablement eu qu’un usage cérémoniel ou est simplement une offrande. Il n’a pas été trouvé dans une sépulture mais dans une grotte-sanctuaire, brisé volontairement (plusieurs parties ont été arrachée et le timbre a été enfoncé par un coup violent).

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

Parade helmet.jpg
Material Iron, bronze, gold, coral
Size 21.4 centimetres (8.4 in) high
23 by 19 centimetres (9.1 by 7.5 in) wide
Cheek-guard: 9.4 by 7.6 centimetres (3.7 by 3.0 in)
Created 4th century BC
Place Agris, Charente, France
Present location Musée d’Angoulême

The Agris Helmet(FrenchCasque d’Agris) is a ceremonial Celtic helmet from c. 350 BC that was found in a cave near Agris, Charente, France, in 1981. It is a masterpiece of Celtic art, and would probably have been used for display rather than worn in battle. The helmet consists of an iron cap completely covered with bands of bronze. The bronze is in turn covered with unusually pure gold leaf, with embedded coral decorations attached using silver rivets. One of the cheek guards was also found and has similar materials and designs. The helmet is mostly decorated in early Celtic patterns but there are later Celtic motifs and signs of Etruscan or Greek influence. The quality of the gold indicates that the helmet may well have been made locally in the Atlantic region.

Discovery

The Agris helmet was found in a cave near Angoulême in 1981.[1] The Perrats cave had been known for just over a week when cavers found two contiguous parts of the front of the helmet on 9–10 May 1981. The fragments were on a cone of debris thrown out from a badger burrow in the cave’s main chamber.[2] An excavation team was quickly formed to search the site. They found scraps of gold leaf, two fragments that joined to form a larger triangular piece, and then the helmet itself, which was well-preserved other than the part that had been torn off by the badgers.[2]

The site shows signs of having been occupied from the Bronze Agethrough the Iron Age, the Gallo-Roman period and into the Middle Ages. The entrance collapsed and closed the cave in the 13th or 14th century AD.[3] At the time of discovery almost all the parts of the helmet had been disturbed by burrowing animals.[4] In 1983, the cheek guard and three fragments of ornamentation from the side of the helmet were discovered during excavations. Other fragments were found in 1986, including the base of the helmet’s crest, several meters from where the helmet had been found. They seem to have been carried there accidentally, either by people or by badgers.[2] The second cheek guard and the ornamentation of the summit of the helmet have not been found.[4]

The government bought the found objects from the proprietor of the land. The helmet was restored by Laszlo von Lehóczky at the Romano-Germanic Central Museum (Mainz).[4] It is now held by the Musée d’Angoulême in Angoulême, France.[5][a] The helmet is considered one of the masterpieces of Celtic art and has been featured in several international exhibitions.[4] It has even formed the basis for a graphic novel, Le casque d’Agris (2005).[6]

Context

Agris Helmet is located in France

Agris Helmet

Location of Agris to the west of the Massif Central in France

Excavations in 2002 show that the cave entrance was guarded by a mud wall and a ditch, and would have been a sanctuary until the early Roman Empire. The helmet is isolated, with no sign of a human burial, and was buried deliberately. At the time of burial at least some of the external ornaments had been broken off and placed in the interior of the helmet.[4]The helmet had been carefully placed.[5] The archaeologists who found it think it may have been buried as part of a ritual to the underworld spirits.[1] Roman sources say that the Celtic warriors generally did not wear helmets.[7] The helmet would have been used for display, and would have indicated the high rank of the owner, or their wish to obtain such a rank.[8]

The helmet dates from the early period of the La Tène culture.[5] The gold leaf is extremely pure, and the helmet may be one of the oldest refined gold objects of Western Europe.[9] It was found further west than most other examples of high-status La Tène metalwork.[1] A few similar objects have been found in France at Amfreville-sous-les-Monts (Normandy), Saint-Jean-Trolimon (Brittany) and Montlaurès near Narbonne (Aude) and in Italy at Canosa (Puglia).[5]

The design of the inner iron cap is similar to that of a series of helmets that have mostly been found in the Central Alps.[2] The veneer of bronze strips recalls Italian helmets of the Montefortino type.[2] The palmette-based design links it to the early style of the La Tène culture.[1] Most of the motifs in the decoration belong to the first western style of the culture, or are closely derived from this style. Other motifs are from an intermediate stage with the Waldalgesheim style.[2]

Authorities differ on the date of the helmet. In a 2001 paper José Gomez De Soto suggests the middle or the second half of the 4th century.[10] D. W. Harding says the stratigraphic association of the helmet with a Dux-type fibula from La Tène B and other signs indicate that it was made in the later part of the 4th century.[1] However, in a 2010 paper Gomez de Soto and Stephane Verger conclude that the decorations, when viewed as a whole, indicate that the helmet was made in the 2nd quarter or the middle of the 4th century.[11]

Structure

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

View of the helmet showing the neck guard (lower left) and cheek protector (lower center)

The helmet has been described as having a jockey-cap shape, but the “bill” of the cap is actually a neck-guard.[12] It is 21.4 centimetres (8.4 in) high and 23 by 19 centimetres (9.1 by 7.5 in) laterally.[13] The inner cap of the helmet is of iron, now heavily corroded.[2] It is made of a single piece of hammered iron, with the neck guard riveted to the back.[11]The iron is entirely covered by ornamental bronze bands with low-relief decoration formed partly by casting and partly by repoussé and chasing.[11] The four wide horizontal strips of bronze are fully covered with gold leaf on the outside surface. The decorations include embedded cabochons of shaped and polished coral.[2]

All the relief decorations were formed on the bronze strips before the gold leaf was applied.[2] The gold leaf, about 70 microns thick, was affixed by pressing it closely onto the bronze relief with a tool that may have been made of wood or bone. The gold leaf would have been held in place by the grooves and imitation filigree in the bronze.[14] The coral cabochons were attached to the bronze by silver rivets whose heads are decorated with motifs such as diamonds or palm leaves.[b][15] Sometimes the hollow that holds the coral was at least partially gold-covered before the coral was placed. Gold leaf was then applied generously around the coral to form a small cup.[16]

There is a finely wrought cheek-piece.[7] The cheek guard (paragnathide) and the side and top ornaments used the same materials and techniques as the main helmet. There are signs that organic materials such as wood and leather were also used.[11]

Decoration

The helmet is particularly richly ornamented.[5] The main theme is a series of palmettes, with many of the palmettes and studs infilled with coral.[1] The ornamentation is arranged into three superimposed bands completely covered by compositions inspired by plants. The many different patterns combined into complex compositions make the headpiece one of the richest of ancient Celtic artworks.[11]

In the lower and upper panels a series of unconnected palmettes are arranged formally in friezes. The central panel decorations are based on a formal arrangement of S-curves terminating in swelling leaves, with a filler pattern that includes palmettes, comma-leaves and over-and-under tendrils. The neck-guard has a less formal and more fluid pattern. The cheek guard has a palmette design in which may be seen a curled serpent that appears to be horned. Horned serpents are often found in Romano-Celtic works in Britain and France, but very rarely in early La Tène. The depiction on the helmet may have some special significance.[1]

The decoration mainly reflects the 5th century Early Style of Celtic Art, but some motifs are characteristic of the Waldalgesheim style of the 4th century,[11] The central panel designs show similarities to the Waldalgesheim bracelets.[1] This indicates that the helmet was made in the first half of the 4th century. The large palmettes with seven petals in the lower band and the main frieze in the central band may have been inspired by architectural terracotta from Tyrrhenian central Italy in the 5th and 4th centuries. The neck guard combines Waldalgesheim style with elements of 4th century Greek or Etruscan work.[11]

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

Origin

Giacobbe Giusti, Agris Helmet (iron, bronze, gold, coral), Musée d’Angoulême

The Amfreville helmet, another Celtic prestige helmet from the Atlantic region.

Three main regions of the Celtic world have been proposed as the origin of the helmet. The first is the northern or central Adriatic region of Italy. Some think the new plant-style compositions were developed by Celtic craftsmen who settled in Italy and were influenced by Etruscan or Greek craftsmen with whom they had direct contact. The complexity of the montage and decoration may be explained by proximity to advanced metalworking centers such as those of Taranto or Campania. The objection is that all Celtic helmets from the period found in Italy were in one piece. Those with riveted neck guards have all been found in the Alps, the regions north of the Alps or the Atlantic region.[17]

The second proposed region of origin is the North Alpine area that formed the ancient center of Celtic culture. The materials and techniques, and the general composition and decoration, seem to place the work among the best 5th century Celtic works from this region.[17] The conical shape of the top of the helmet seems to be derived from Celtic helmets from the start of the second Iron Age. Where these were decorated, the decorations were in superimposed bands. Some details of the plant ornamentation are very similar to small Celtic ornaments from Austria, the Alpine regions and western Switzerland. This is the area where helmets with riveted neck guards are found most often.[17]

The third possibility is that the helmet was made in the area where it was found. It is one of a small set of prestige helmets that were mostly found in western France, the most famous being the completely decorated helmet of Amfreville-sous-les-Monts in the Eure.[17] All were made of an iron or bronze cap covered with bands of another metal that were completely decorated. They have red ornaments, mostly coral. Riveted neck pieces are also found in this region.[17]

Gold samples from various parts of the helmet are exceptionally pure, typically 99% gold, 0.5% silver and 0.2% copper.[18] This degree of purity is very unusual in the ancient world.[18] Analysis of Greek and Etruscan objects of the period shows much higher silver content.[9]Most ancient objects with this degree of purity have been found to the southwest of the Loire, the region that includes Agris.[9] The only comparable objects are 3rd century Celtic jewelry from this region.[18]Probably the helmet was made in the West by craftsmen trained in the North Alpine School.[10] The gold may well have come from mines in the west of the Massif Central, which had been in operation since at least the 5th century BC. Other high-quality works of Celtic art have been found in the Western region, so a local provenance is entirely possible.[18]

Notes

  1. Jump up^ It is sometimes reported that the helmet was given to the Archaeological and Historical Society of the Charente. This is incorrect.[4]
  2. Jump up^ The rivets are made of an alloy with at least 80% silver, 20% gold and almost 1% copper. This would have been relatively easy to work, but stronger than pure gold or silver.[15]

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agris_Helmet

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com

Giacobbe Giusti, Tomb of the Triclinium

Giacobbe Giusti, Tomb of the Triclinium

 

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Tomb of the Triclinium

 

A map showing the extent of Etruria and the Etruscan civilization. The map includes the 12 cities of the Etruscan League and notable cities founded by the Etruscans. The dates on the map are an approximation based on the sources I had. If the article is updated with more accurate dates let me know and I’ll modify this map to suit.

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Tomb of the Triclinium

Giacobbe Giusti, Tomb of the Triclinium

Detail of two dancers on the right wall

The Tomb of the Triclinium(ItalianTomba del Triclinio) or the Funereal Bed (del Letto Funebre)[1] is an Etruscantomb in the Necropolis of Monterozzi near TarquiniaItaly. It was discovered in 1830.[2] Stefan Steingraber, Associate Professor at the Italian Research University ‘Roma Tre’[3], dates the tomb to approximately 470 BC and calls it one of the most famous of all Etruscan tombs. He considers the artistic quality of the tomb’s frescoes to be superior to those of most other Etruscan tombs.[4] The tomb is named after the triclinium, the formal dining room which appears in the frescoes of the tomb.[2]

Since its discovery the tomb’s frescoes have deteriorated and lost some of their color and detail. In 1949 they were moved to the Tarquinia National Museum to conserve them. Thanks to the watercolor copies made by Carlo Ruspi shortly after the discovery of the tomb it is still possible to see the frescoes in their former state.[2]

Description

Giacobbe Giusti, Tomb of the Triclinium

Detail of a barbiton player on the left wall

The tomb consists of a single room. The fresco on the back wall shows a banquet scene, borrowed from depictions of drinking scenes on Attic red-figure pottery from the early fifth century. The banqueteers recline on three couches called klinai.[4] On the floor under the klinai a cat prowls towards a rooster and a partridge.[2] On the left wall three female dancers, one male dancer and a male musician with a barbitonappear. They are placed between small trees filled with birds. On the right wall a similar scene is shown. On the entry wall two youths jump down from their horses. They may be apobates or a reference to the Dioscuri as intermediaries between the earthly life and the afterlife.[4]

The similarities between the frescoes in the Tomb of the Triclinium and Tomb 5513 (also in the Necropolis of Monterozzi) led Steingraber to conclude that they were the products of the same workshop. The strong influence of red-figure Attic vase painting has convinced some experts that the artist who decorated the tomb was a Greek metic.[4]

References

  1. Jump up^ Corneto“, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., 1878.
  2. Jump up to:abcd Haynes, Sybille (2005). Etruscan Civilization: A Cultural History. Los Angeles, California: Getty Publications. p. 235. ISBN978-0-89236-600-2.
  3. Jump up^http://www.uniroma3.it/en/persone/a242ekJhYlordzZZUCs2WU9ZLzJNMm5qS2dEUUVjaVBTYS8zM0NEY3pDQT0
  4. Jump up to:abcd Steingräber, Stephan (2006). Abundance of Life: Etruscan Wall Painting. Los Angeles, California: Getty Publications. pp. 134–139. ISBN978-0-89236-865-5.

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries, Florence

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

 

 

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

 

 

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

Microsoft founder Bill Gates is the not-too-shabby name behind the Uffizi’s next blockbuster exhibition, The Codex Leicester. Water, Nature’s Microscope, a highly anticipated show curated by Paolo Galluzzi, director of the Museo Galileo. Since 1994, Gates has owned the Codex, one of the most thorough testaments to Leonardo Da Vinci’s inquisitive mind and wide-ranging interests and abilities. A manuscript comprising notes and drawings of Leonardo’s scientific experiments, the Codex Leicester bears witness to his investigations of geological, mechanical and astronomical phenomena, but primarily to his fascination with water, particularly its movement and capacity for destruction. The exhibition takes place as part of myriad celebrations marking the 500th anniversary of the death of Leonardo da Vinci; other drawings and works on loan from a range of institutions will also be on display. For more information, see http://www.uffizi.it.

 

The Uffizi Gallery, located in the heart of Florence, isn’t just one of the biggest museums in Italy but also one of the most renowned in the whole world, especially for its large collection of artwork from the Renaissance. During its long “life” (it has been open to the public since 1765), it has hosted countless exhibitions— and yet the one opening at the end of this month might be one of its most striking yet.

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

The Uffizi is considered one of the oldest art gallery in the world. Photo by Juliet Coombe/Lonely Planet

That’s mainly because 2019 will be the 500th anniversary of Leonardo da Vinci’s death. A true “Renaissance man”, Leonardo’s interests varied from painting to engineering, and his studies gave birth to several modern practices like palaeontology and architecture. The Uffizi Gallery is then getting a head start on celebrations with its new exhibition, titled Water, nature’s microscope— The Codex Leicester and Leonardo da Vinci, which will display many works and studies of the “Universal Genius”.

That’s the other reason why this exhibition is so unique— the fact that the Codex Leicester will be exposed in Italy for only the second time since it passed out of the hands of the Earls of Leicester. The Codex was bought in 1980 by Armand Hammer (and in 1982 it visited Italy for the first time with the name of Codex Hammer), and then in 1994 by Bill Gates. The founder of Microsoft bought it for the staggering price of US$30 million (which makes the Codex the second highest selling book in history) and digitised all its pages— some of them were even distributed as screensavers and wallpapers for early versions of Microsoft Windows. The Codex Leicester contains studies Leonardo made on water, hydraulics, the luminosity of the Moon and the history of planet Earth— he compiled the 72 folios between 1504 and 1508, the time during which Florence was called the “school of the world”.

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

A folio of the Codex Leicester containing studies on the ashen light. Photo courtesy Bill Gates/©bgC3

At the Uffizi, the Codex will be displayed with a new instrument called the Codescope, which will allow visitors to turn the Codex’s pages digitally and see for themselves what went on in Leonardo da Vinci’s head. Eike Schmidt, the director of the Uffizi Gallery, said in a statement that this exhibition truly demonstrates “the museum’s care in making accessible for everyone complex themes about scientific research, and also in looking fundamental episodes in the history of science with a new and modern point of view”.

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

Another folio of the Codex Leicester containing studies on water pressure. Photo courtesy Bill Gates/©bgC3

The rest of the exhibition focuses on science as well, with books and folios coming from the rest of Italy and the rest of Europe— the Vatican Library in Rome, the British Library in London, and the Royal Library in Turin, which has lent to the Uffizi Gallery its famous “Codex on the Flight of Birds,” where Leonardo attempted to create a machine that would allow human beings to fly. Other artists and scientists of the Renaissance will also be featured alongside Leonardo.

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

A folio from the “Codex on the Flight of Birds”. Photo courtesy of the Biblioteca Reale di Torino

“The exhibition invites visitors into a time of brave ideas, futuristic projects, and thoughts of immense geniality,” said Paolo Galluzzi, director of Museo Galileo (a partner of the exhibition), in a statement. So, if you want to step into the Renaissance and the brilliant mind of Leonardo da Vinci and his contemporaries, you can do so starting 30 October and until 20 January, when the exhibition will close.

Giacobbe Giusti, LEONARDO/Codex Leicester October 29-January 20, 2019 Uffizi Galleries

The corridor of the Uffizi Gallery. 

If you want to know more, or are looking for information on how to plan your visit once the end of the month rolls around, you can visit the Uffizi Gallery’s website here.

https://www.lonelyplanet.com/news/2018/10/03/new-leonardo-da-vinci-exhibit-florence-uffizi/

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

On the basis of File:Europe 526.jpg, which is a part of a map from the map collection of the Perry-Castañeda Library (PCL) of the University of Texas at Austin

L’Europa nel 526 d.C. I regni romano-barbarici.

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

Eagle-shaped Visigothic fibula.

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

Mosaic depicting the palace of Theodoric the Great in his palace chapel of San Apollinare Nuovo

The Ostrogoths(LatinOstrogothi, Austrogothi) were the eastern branch of the older Goths(the other major branch being the Visigoths). The Ostrogoths traced their origins to the Greutungi – a branch of the Goths who had migrated southward from the Baltic Sea and established a kingdomnorth of the Black Sea, during the 3rd and 4th centuries. They built an empire stretching from the Black Sea to the Baltic. The Ostrogoths were probably literate in the 3rd century, and their trade with the Romans was highly developed. Their Danubian kingdom reached its zenith under King Ermanaric, who is said to have committed suicide at an old age when the Huns attacked his people and subjugated them in about 370.

After their annexation by the Huns, little is heard of the Ostrogoths for about 80 years, after which they reappear in Pannonia on the middle Danube River as federates of the Romans. After the collapse of the Hun empire after the Battle of Nedao (453), Ostrogoths migrated westwards towards Illyria and the borders of Italy, while some remained in the Crimea (where the Crimean Ostrogoths existed as a distinct people until at least the 16th century). During the late 5th and 6th centuries, under Theodoric the Great most of the Ostrogoths moved first to Moesia (c. 475–488) and later conquered the Kingdom of Italy of the Germanic warrior Odoacer. In 493, Theodoric the Great established a kingdom in Italy.

A period of instability then ensued, tempting the Eastern RomanEmperor Justinian to declare war on the Ostrogoths in 535 in an effort to restore the former western provinces of the Roman Empire. Initially, the Byzantines were successful, but under the leadership of Totila, the Goths reconquered most of the lost territory until Totila’s death at the Battle of TaginaeThe war lasted for almost 21 years and caused enormous damage and depopulation of Italy. The remaining Ostrogoths were absorbed into the Lombards who established a kingdom in Italy in 568.

Divided Goths: Greuthungi and Ostrogothi

Map of Scandza according to Jordanes: the Ostrogothic homelandwas located in the south of Sweden

A division of the Goths is first attested in 291.[1][a] The Tervingi are first attested around that date; the GreuthungiVesi, and Ostrogothi are all attested no earlier than 388.[2] The Greuthungi are first named by Ammianus Marcellinus, writing no earlier than 392 and perhaps later than 395, and basing his account on the words of a Tervingian chieftain who is attested as early as 376.[2] The Ostrogoths are first named in a document dated September 392 from Milan.[2] Claudian mentions that they together with the Greuthungi inhabit Phrygia.[1] According to Herwig Wolfram, the primary sources either use the terminology of Tervingi/Greuthungi or Vesi/Ostrogothi and never mix the pairs.[2] All four names were used together, but the pairing was always preserved, as in Gruthungi, Ostrogothi, Tervingi, Vesi.[3] That the Tervingi were the Vesi/Visigothi and the Greuthungi the Ostrogothi is also supported by Jordanes.[4] He identified the Visigothic kings from Alaric I to Alaric II as the heirs of the fourth-century Tervingian king Athanaric and the Ostrogothic kings from Theodoric the Great to Theodahad as the heirs of the Greuthungian king Ermanaric. This interpretation, however, though very common among scholars today, is not universal. According to the Jordanes’ Getica, around 400 the Ostrogoths were ruled by Ostrogotha and derived their name from this “father of the Ostrogoths”, but modern historians often assume the converse, that Ostrogotha was named after the people.[2]

Both Herwig Wolfram and Thomas Burns conclude that the terms Tervingi and Greuthungi were geographical identifiers used by each tribe to describe the other.[3][5] This terminology therefore dropped out of use after the Goths were displaced by the Hunnic invasions. In support of this, Wolfram cites Zosimus as referring to a group of “Scythians” north of the Danube who were called “Greuthungi” by the barbarians north of the Ister.[6] Wolfram asserts that it was the Tervingi who remained behind after the Hunnic conquest.[6] He further believes that the terms “Vesi” and “Ostrogothi” were used by the peoples to boastfully describe themselves.[3] On this understanding, the Greuthungi and Ostrogothi were more or less the same people.[5]

The nomenclature of Greuthungi and Tervingi fell out of use shortly after 400.[2] In general, the terminology of a divided Gothic people disappeared gradually after they entered the Roman Empire.[3] The term “Visigoth”, however, was an invention of the sixth century. Cassiodorus, a Roman in the service of Theodoric the Great, invented the term Visigothi to match Ostrogothi, which terms he thought of as “western Goths” and “eastern Goths” respectively.[3] The western-eastern division was a simplification and a literary device of sixth-century historians where political realities were more complex.[7]Furthermore, Cassiodorus used the term “Goths” to refer only to the Ostrogoths, whom he served, and reserved the geographical term “Visigoths” for the Gallo-Hispanic Goths. This usage, however, was adopted by the Visigoths themselves in their communications with the Byzantine Empire and was in use in the seventh century.[7]

Other names for the Goths abounded. A “Germanic” Byzantine or Italian author referred to one of the two peoples as the Valagothi, meaning “Roman [walha] Goths”.[7] In 484 the Ostrogoths had been called the Valameriaci (men of Valamir) because they followed Theodoric, a descendant of Valamir.[7] This terminology survived in the Byzantine East as late as the reign of Athalaric, who was called του Ουαλεμεριακου (tou Oualemeriakou) by John Malalas.[8]

Etymology

Giacobbe Giusti, Ostrogoths

Ostrogothic bow-fibulae (c. 500) from Emilia-RomagnaItaly

The Gothic name makes its first appearance sometime between 16 and 18 AD with earlier indications related to the Guti of Scandia or possibly attributable to the Gutones.[9] Procopius wrote of the Gauts in Thule and Cassiodorus mentioned the Gauthigoths amid his list of Scandinavian peoples.[10]Two distinct groups of Gothic peoples are first attested to in 291, the western Tervingi-Vesi and the eastern Greutungi-Ostrogothi.[2] “Greuthungi” may mean “steppe dwellers” or “people of the pebbly coasts”.[3] The root greut– is probably related to the Old English greot, meaning “flat”.[11] This is supported by evidence that geographic descriptors were commonly used to distinguish people living north of the Black Sea both before and after Gothic settlement there and by the lack of evidence for an earlier date for the name pair Tervingi-Greuthungi than the late third century.[12]

However, that the name “Greuthungi” has pre-Pontic, possibly Scandinavian, origins has support.[12] It may mean “rock people”, (related to the Old Norse grjut huningi) to distinguish the Ostrogoths from the Geats (referred as Goths in Scandinavia) from Götaland(Gothland) in southern Sweden.[13] The Roman historian Jordanesrefers to an Evagreotingi (Greuthung island) in Scandza, as part of his description of Gothiscandza. It has also been suggested that Greuthungi may be related to certain place names in Poland, but this has met with little support.[13]

“Ostrogothi” means “Goths of (or glorified by) the rising sun”.[3] This has been interpreted as “gleaming Goths” or “east Goths”. By the 4th century the Ostrogoths had developed a distinct language known as Gothic. Classified by linguists as an east Germanic language, Gothic eventually died out sometime in the Middle Ages as the Visigoths and Ostrogoths were absorbed by other European peoples.[14]

Language

While none of the eastern Germanic languages are still spoken, Gothic is the only one with “continuous texts” remaining. Singularly the most important work amid the surviving Gothic texts is the translation of the Bible by the Visigothic bishop Ulfilas, comprising the earliest remnants of the Germanic languages known.[15] Smatterings of the Gothic language can be found in Italian but its presence is minimal. A language related to Gothic was still spoken sporadically in Crimea as late as the 16th and 17th centuries (Crimean Gothic language).[15]Much of the disappearance of the Gothic language is attributable to the Goths’ cultural and linguistic absorption by other European peoples during the Middle Ages.[16]

Foundation

  Traditional Götaland
  Island of Gotland
  Wielbark Culture, early 3rd century
  Chernyakhov culture, early 4th century

Mentioned in several sources up to the third century AD when they apparently split into at least two groups, the Greuthungi in the east and Tervingi in the west, the two Gothic tribes shared many aspects, especially recognizing a patron deity the Romans named Mars. This so-called “split” or, more appropriately, resettlement of western tribes into the Roman province of Dacia was a natural result of population saturation of the area north of the Black Sea. The Goths in Dacia established a vast and powerful kingdom during the third and fourth centuries between the Danube and the Dniepr in what is now RomaniaMoldova and western Ukraine. This was a multi-tribal state ruled by a Gothic elite but inhabited by many other interrelated but multi-tongue tribes including the Iranian-speaking Sarmatians, the Germanic-speaking Gepids, the Thracian-speaking Dacians, other minor Celtic and Thracian tribes and possibly early Slavs.[17] Unfortunately the exact geographical dividing line between the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths is not known but in general terms, the Visigoths occupied Dacia, Moldavia and Walachia, whereas the Ostrogoths lived in the steppe regions beyond the Dniester River, ruling over a large confederation of Germanic and Scythian tribes, covering a vast territory in what is now Ukraine and areas of southern Russia. Jordanes calls the realm Oium, or Aujum.[18]

Hunnic invasions

The rise of the Huns around 370 overwhelmed the Gothic kingdoms.[19] Many of the Goths migrated into Roman territory in the Balkans, while others remained north of the Danube under Hunnic rule. Frequently the Ostrogoths fought alongside both Alans and Huns.[20] It was the Ostrogoths who were first subdued by the Huns.[21] Like other tribal peoples, they became one of the many Hunnic vassals fighting in Europe, as in the Battle of Chalons in 451. Several uprisings against the Huns were suppressed. The collapse of Hunnic power in the 450s led to further violent upheaval in the lands north of the Danube, during which the Ostrogoths expanded slowly southwards into the Balkans, and then westwards towards Illyria and the borders of Italy. Their rule was marked by turmoil with hostile neighbors all around and the land they acquired between Vindobona (Vienna) and Sirmium (Sremska Mitrovica) was not well managed, a fact which rendered the Ostrogoths dependent upon Constantinople for subsidies.[22]

Post-Hunnic movements

Their recorded history begins with their independence from the remains of the Hunnic Empire following the death of Attila the Hun in 453. Now allied with the Huns’ former vassals, the Gepids, the Ostrogoths under Theodemir broke the Hunnic power of Attila’s sons in the Battle of Nedao in 454, although the Ostrogoth contribution to the battle’s success was minimal.[23]

The Ostrogoths now entered into relations with the Empire, and were settled on lands in Pannonia, becoming foederati (federates) to the Byzantines.[19] During the greater part of the latter half of the 5th century, the East Goths played in south-eastern Europe nearly the same part that the Western Goths (Visigoths) played in the century before. They were seen going to and from, in every conceivable relation of friendship and enmity with the Eastern Roman power, until, just as the West Goths had done before them, they passed from the East to the West. Unchallenged by the now-dissipated power of the Huns, the Ostrogoths under Valamir were themselves powerful and absorbed elements from other, smaller tribes, such as the Scirii. A dispute with the Eastern Roman emperor at Constantinople caused Valamir to lead his Ostrogoths against him. With the barbarians at the gates, Emperor Leo I agreed to pay an annual subsidy of gold.[24]

Kingdom in Italy

Part of a series on the
History of Italy
Old map of Italian peninsula
Timeline

Flag of Italy.svg Italy portal

Ostrogothic Kingdom of Italy

The greatest of all Ostrogothic rulers, the future Theodoric the Great (whose Gothic name meant “leader of the people”) of Ostrogothic Kingdom(Regnum Italiae, “Kingdom of Italy”)[b], was born to Theodemirin or about 454, soon after the Battle of Nedao. His childhood was spent at Constantinople as a diplomatic hostage, where he was carefully educated.[25] The early part of his life was taken up with various disputes, intrigues and wars within the Byzantine empire, in which he had as his rival Theodoric Strabo of the Thracian Goths, a distant relative of Theodoric the Great and son of Triarius. This older but lesser Theodoric seems to have been the chief, not the king, of that branch of the Ostrogoths that had settled within the Empire earlier. Theodoric the Great, as he is sometimes distinguished, was sometimes the friend, sometimes the enemy, of the Empire.[19] In the former case he was clothed with various Roman titles and offices, as patrician and consul; but in all cases alike he remained the national Ostrogothic king.[24] Theodoric is also known for his attainment of support from the Catholic Church and on one occasion, he even helped resolve a disputed papal election.[26] During his reign, Theodoric, who was an Arian, allowed freedom of religion, which had not been done before. However, he did try to appease the Pope and tried to keep his alliance with the church strong. He saw the Pope as an authority not only in the church but also over Rome itself. His ability to work well with the Italy’s nobles, members of the Roman Senate, and the Catholic Church all helped facilitate his acceptance as the ruler of Italy.[27]

Theodoric sought to revive Roman culture and government and in doing so, profited the Italian people.[28] It was in both characters together that he set out in 488, by commission from the Byzantineemperor Zeno, to recover Italy from Odoacer. In 489, the Rugii, a Germanic tribe who dwelt in the Hungarian Plain, joined the Ostrogoths in their invasion of Italy under their leader Frideric.[29] By 493 Ravenna was taken, where Theodoric would set up his capital. It was also at this time that Odoacer was killed by Theodoric’s own hand.[30] Ostrogothic power was fully established over Italy, SicilyDalmatia and the lands to the north of Italy. Around 500, Theodoric celebrated his thirtieth anniversary as King of the Ostrogoths.[31] In order to improve their chances against the Roman Empire the Ostrogoths and Visigoths began again to unite in what became a loose confederation of Germanic peoples.[32] The two branches of the nation were soon brought closer together; after he was forced to become regent of the Visigothic kingdom of Toulouse, the power of Theodoric was practically extended over a large part of Gaul and over nearly the whole of the Iberian peninsula. Theodoric forged alliances with the Visigoths, Alamanni, Franks and Burgundians, some of which were accomplished through diplomatic marriages.[32]

The Ostrogothic dominion was once again as far-reaching and splendid as it was in the time of Hermanaric; however it was now of a wholly different character. The dominion of Theodoric was not a barbarian but a civilized power. His twofold position ran through everything. He was at once king of the Goths and successor, though without any imperial titles, of the Western Roman emperors. The two nations, differing in manners, language and religion, lived side by side on the soil of Italy; each was ruled according to its own law, by the prince who was, in his two separate characters, the common sovereign of both.[24] Due to his ability to foster and leverage relations among the various Germanic kingdoms, the Byzantines began to fear Theodoric’s power, which led to an alliance between the Byzantine emperor and the Frankish king, Clovis I, a pact designed to counteract and ultimately overthrow the Ostrogoths. In some ways Theodoric may have been overly accommodating to both the Romans and other Gothic people as he placated Catholics and Arian Christians alike. Historian Herwig Wolfram suggests that Theodoric’s efforts in trying to appease Latin and barbarian cultures in kind brought about the collapse of Ostrogothic predominance and also resulted in the “end of Italy as the heartland of late antiquity.”[33] All the years of creating a protective perimeter around Italy were broken down by the Franco-Byzantine coalition. Theodoric was able to temporarily salvage some of his realm with the assistance of the Thuringians.[34] Realizing that the Franks were the most significant threat to the Visigothic empire as well, Alaric II, (who was the son-in-law of Theodoric) enlisted the aide of the Burgundians and fought against the Franks at the urging of the magnates of his tribe, but this choice proved an error and he allegedly met his end at the hand of the Frankish king, Clovis.[35]

A time of confusion followed the death of Alaric II who was slain during the Battle of Vouillé. The Ostrogothic king Theodoric stepped in as the guardian of his grandson Amalaric,[36] and preserved for him all his Iberian and a fragment of his Gallic dominion. Toulouse passed to the Franks but the Goth kept Narbonne and its district and Septimania, which was the last part of Gaul held by the Goths, keeping the name of Gothia for many years. While Theodoric lived, the Visigothic kingdom was practically united to his own dominion. He seems also to have claimed a kind of protectorate over the Germanic powers generally, and indeed to have practically exercised it, except in the case of the Franks. From 508–511 under Theodoric’s command, the Ostrogoths marched on Gaul as the Vandal king of Carthage and Clovis made concerted efforts to weaken his hold on the Visigoths.[37]On the death of Theodoric in 526, the eastern and western Goths were once again divided.[24][38] By the late 6th century, the Ostrogoths lost their political identity and assimilated into other Germanic tribes.[32]

The picture of Theodoric’s rule is drawn for us in the state papers drawn up, in his name and in the names of his successors, by his Roman minister Cassiodorus. The Goths seem to have been thick on the ground in northern Italy; in the south they formed little more than garrisons.[24] In Theodoric’s view, the Goth was the armed protector of the peaceful Roman; the Gothic king had the toil of government, while the Roman consul had the honour. All the forms of the Roman administration went on, and the Roman policy and culture had great influence on the Goths themselves. The rule of the prince over distinct nations in the same land was necessarily despotic; the old Germanic freedom was necessarily lost. Such a system needed a Theodoric to carry it on. It broke in pieces after his death.[24] Meanwhile, the Frankish king Clovis fought protracted wars against various enemies while consolidating his rule, forming the embryonic stages of what would eventually become Medieval Europe.[39]

War with Byzantium (535–554)

Coin of Theodahad (534-536), minted in Rome-he wears the barbaric moustache.

Absent the unifying presence of Theodoric, the Ostrogoths and Visigoths were unable to consolidate their realms despite their common Germanic kinship. The few instances where they acted together after this time are as scattered and incidental as they were before. Amalaric succeeded to the Visigothic kingdom in Iberia and Septimania. Theodoric’s grandson Athalaric took on the mantle as king of the Ostrogoths for the next five years.[40] Provence was added to the dominion of the new Ostrogothic king Athalaric and through his daughter Amalasuntha who was named regent.[32] Both were unable to settle disputes among Gothic elites. Theodahad, cousin of Amalasuntha and nephew of Theodoric through his sister, took over and slew them;[41] however the usurping ushered in more bloodshed.

The weakness of the Ostrogothic position in Italy now showed itself. The Eastern Roman Emperor Justinian I always strove to restore as much of the Western Roman Empire as he could and certainly would not pass up the opportunity. Launched on both land and sea, Justinian began his war of reconquest.[42] In 535, he commissioned Belisarius to attack the Ostrogoths following the success he had in North Africa against the Vandals.[43] It was Justinian’s intention to recover Italy and Rome from the Goths.[44] Belisarius quickly captured Sicily and then crossed into Italy, where he captured Naples and Rome in December of 536. Sometime during the spring of 537, the Goths marched on Rome with upwards of 100,000 men under the leadership of Witigesand laid siege to the city, albeit unsuccessfully. Despite outnumbering the Romans by a five-to-one margin, the Goths could not loose Belisarius from the former western capital of the Empire.[45] After recuperating from siege warfare, Belisarius marched north, taking Mediolanum (Milan) and the Ostrogoth capital of Ravenna in 540.[46]

With the attack on Ravenna, Witiges and his men were trapped in the Ostrogothic capital. Belisarius proved more capable at siege warfare than his rival Witiges had been at Rome and the Ostrogoth ruler, who was also dealing with Frankish enemies, was forced to surrender, but not without terms. Belisarius refused to grant any concessions save unconditional surrender in view of the fact that Justinian wanted to make Witiges a vassal king in Trans-Padane Italy.[47] This condition made for something of an impasse.

Totila razes the walls of Florence: illumination from the Chigi manuscript of Villani’s Cronica

A faction of the Gothic nobility pointed out that their own king Witiges, who had just lost, was something of a weakling and they would need a new one. Eraric, the leader of the group, endorsed Belisarius and the rest of the kingdom agreed, so they offered him their crown.[48]Belisarius was a soldier, not a statesman, and still loyal to Justinian. He made as if to accept the offer, rode to Ravenna to be crowned, and promptly arrested the leaders of the Goths and reclaimed their entire kingdom—no halfway settlements—for the Empire. Fearful that Belisarius might set himself up a permanent kingship should he consolidate his conquests, Justinian recalled him to Constantinople with Witiges in tow.[49]

As soon as Belisarius was gone, the remaining Ostrogoths elected a new king named Totila. Under the brilliant command of Totila, the Goths were able to reassert themselves to a degree. For a period of nearly ten years, control for Italy became a seesaw battle between Byzantine and Ostrogothic forces.[50] Totila eventually recaptured all of northern Italy and even drove the Byzantines out of Rome, thereby affording him the opportunity to take political control of the city, partly by executing the Roman senatorial order. Many of them fled eastwards for Constantinople.[51]

By 550 Justinian was able to put together an enormous force, an assembly designed to recover his losses and subdue any Gothic resistance. In 551, the Roman navy destroyed Totila’s fleet and in 552 an overwhelming Byzantine force under Narses entered Italy from the north. Attempting to surprise the invading Byzantines, Totila gambled with his forces at Taginaei, where he was slain.[51] Broken but not yet defeated, the Ostrogoths made one final stand at Campania under a chief named Teia, but when he was also killed in battle at Nuceria they finally capitulated. On surrendering, they informed Narses that evidently “the hand of God was against them” and so they left Italy for the northern lands of their fathers.[52] After that final defeat, the Ostrogothic name wholly died. The nation had practically evaporated with Theodoric’s death. “The leadership of western Europe therefore passed by default to the Franks. Consequently, Ostrogothic failure and Frankish success were crucial for the development of early medieval Europe, for Theodoric had made it “his intention to restore the vigor of Roman government and Roman culture”.[53] The chance of forming a national state in Italy by the union of Roman and Germanic elements, such as those that arose in Gaul, in Iberia, and in parts of Italy under Lombard rule, was thus lost. The failures of the barbarian kingdoms to maintain control of the regions they conquered were partly the result of leadership vacuums like those which resulted from the death of Theodoric (also the lack of male succession) and Totila but additionally as a consequence of political fragmentation amid the Germanic tribes as their loyalties wavered between their kin and their erstwhile enemies. Frankish entry onto the geopolitical map of Europe also bears into play: had the Ostrogoths attained more military success against the Byzantines on the battlefield by combining the strength of other Germanic tribes, this could have changed the direction of Frankish loyalty.[54] Military success or defeat and political legitimacy were interrelated in barbarian society.[55]

Nevertheless, according to Roman historian Procopius of Caesarea, the Ostrogothic population was allowed to live peacefully in Italy with their Rugian allies under Roman sovereignty. They later joined the Lombards during their conquest of Italy.[c]

Culture

Ostrogoth ear jewels, Metropolitan Museum of Art

Of Gothic literature in the Gothic language we have the Bible of Ulfilas and some other religious writings and fragments. Of Gothic legislation in Latin we have the edict of Theodoric of the year 500, and the Variae of Cassiodorus may pass as a collection of the state papers of Theodoric and his immediate successors. Among the Visigoths, written laws had already been put forth by Euric. Alaric II put forth a Breviarium of Roman law for his Roman subjects; but the great collection of Visigothic laws dates from the later days of the monarchy, being put forth by King Reccaswinthabout 654. This code gave occasion to some well-known comments by Montesquieu and Gibbon, and has been discussed by Savigny (Geschichte des römischen Rechts, ii. 65) and various other writers. They are printed in the Monumenta Germaniae, leges, tome i. (1902).[56]

Of special Gothic histories, besides that of Jordanes, already so often quoted, there is the Gothic history of Isidore, archbishop of Seville, a special source of the history of the Visigothic kings down to Suinthila(621-631). But all the Latin and Greek writers contemporary with the days of Gothic predominance make their constant contributions. Not for special facts, but for a general estimate, no writer is more instructive than Salvian of Marseilles in the 5th century, whose work, De Gubernatione Dei, is full of passages contrasting the vices of the Romans with the virtues of the “barbarians”, especially of the Goths. In all such pictures we must allow a good deal for exaggeration both ways, but there must be a groundwork of truth. The chief virtues that the Roman Catholic presbyter praises in the Arian Goths are their chastity, their piety according to their own creed, their tolerance towards the Catholics under their rule, and their general good treatment of their Roman subjects. He even ventures to hope that such good people may be saved, notwithstanding their heresy. This image must have had some basis in truth, but it is not very surprising that the later Visigoths of Iberia had fallen away from Salvian’s somewhat idealistic picture.[56]

Ostrogothic rulers

Amal dynasty

Later kings

Notes

Citations

  1. Jump up to:a b Wolfram 1988, p. 24, fn52.
  2. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Wolfram 1988, p. 24.
  3. Jump up to:a b c d e f g Wolfram 1988, p. 25.
  4. Jump up^ Heather 1996, pp. 52–57, 300–301.
  5. Jump up to:a b Burns 1984, p. 44.
  6. Jump up to:a b Wolfram 1988, p. 387, fn57.
  7. Jump up to:a b c d Wolfram 1988, p. 26.
  8. Jump up^ Wolfram 1988, p. 389, fn67.
  9. Jump up^ Wolfram 1988, p. 20.
  10. Jump up^ Wolfram 1988, p. 21.
  11. Jump up^ Burns 1984, p. 30.
  12. Jump up to:a b Wolfram 1988, pp. 387–388, fn58.
  13. Jump up to:a b Wolfram 1988, p. 387, fn58.
  14. Jump up^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 574.
  15. Jump up to:a b Dalby 1999, p. 229.
  16. Jump up^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 572.
  17. Jump up^ Encyclopædia Britannica—Ostrogoths
  18. Jump up^ Bury 2000, p. 25.
  19. Jump up to:a b c Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 575.
  20. Jump up^ Todd 1999, p. 177.
  21. Jump up^ Bury 2000, p. 55.
  22. Jump up^ Todd 1999, p. 178.
  23. Jump up^ Burns 1984, p. 52.
  24. Jump up to:a b c d e f De Puy 1899, p. 2865.
  25. Jump up^ Backman 2008, p. 68.
  26. Jump up^ Frassetto 2003, p. 338.
  27. Jump up^ Frassetto 2003, pp. 338–339.
  28. Jump up^ Cantor 1994, p. 109.
  29. Jump up^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 665.
  30. Jump up^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 575–576.
  31. Jump up^ Bury 2000, p. 178.
  32. Jump up to:a b c d Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 576.
  33. Jump up^ Wolfram 1988, p. 332.
  34. Jump up^ Wolfram 1997, pp. 218–221.
  35. Jump up^ Wolfram 1997, p. 155.
  36. Jump up^ Larned 1895, p. 134.
  37. Jump up^ Wolfram 1997, p. 220.
  38. Jump up^ Wolfram 1997, p. 225.
  39. Jump up^ Collins 1999, pp. 116–137.
  40. Jump up^ Wolfram 1988, p. 334.
  41. Jump up^ Wolfram 1988, pp. 332–333, 337–340.
  42. Jump up^ Wolfram 1988, p. 339.
  43. Jump up^ Halsall 2007, pp. 500–501.
  44. Jump up^ Halsall 2007, p. 501.
  45. Jump up^ Oman 1902, pp. 89–90.
  46. Jump up^ Halsall 2007, pp. 502–503.
  47. Jump up^ Oman 1902, p. 91.
  48. Jump up^ Halsall 2007, p. 503.
  49. Jump up^ Bauer 2010, p. 208.
  50. Jump up^ Bauer 2010, p. 210.
  51. Jump up to:a b Halsall 2007, p. 504.
  52. Jump up^ Oman 1902, pp. 95–96.
  53. Jump up^ Cantor 1994, p. 105–107.
  54. Jump up^ Halsall 2007, pp. 505–512.
  55. Jump up^ Halsall 2007, p. 512.
  56. Jump up to:a b Chisholm 1910, p. 275.

Bibliography

  • Amory, PatrickPeople and Identity in Ostrogothic Italy, 489–554. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. ISBN 0-521-52635-3.
  • Backman, Clifford R (2008). The Worlds of Medieval Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-533527-9.
  • Bauer, Susan Wise (2010). The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-39305-975-5.
  • Burns, Thomas (1984). A History of the Ostrogoths. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-32831-4.
  • Bury, J. B. (2000). The Invasion of Europe by the Barbarians. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-39300-388-8.
  • Cantor, Norman F. (1994). The Civilization of the Middle Ages. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 0-06-092553-1.
  • Chisholm, Hugh (1910). The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Information. (Volumes 11-12). New York: Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.
  • Collins, Roger (1999). Early Medieval Europe, 300–1000. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-33365-808-6.
  • Dalby, Andrew (1999). Dictionary of Languages. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-23111-568-1.
  • De Puy, William Harrison (1899). The World-wide Encyclopedia and Gazetteer (vol 4). New York: Werner Co.
  • Encyclopædia Britannica, “Ostrogoth”, stable URL: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/434454/Ostrogoth
  • Frassetto, Michael (2003). Encyclopedia of Barbarian Europe: Society in Transformation. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-263-9.
  • Halsall, Guy (2007). Barbarian Migrations and the Roman West, 376–568. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-52143-543-7.
  • Heather, Peter (1996). The Goths. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. ISBN 0-631-16536-3.
  • Larned, J. N., ed. (1895). History for Ready Reference. Cambridge, MA: C.A. Nichols.
  • Mierow, Charles Christopher (translator). The Gothic History of Jordanes. In English Version with an Introduction and a Commentary. 1915. Reprinted by Evolution Publishing, 2006. ISBN 1-889758-77-9.
  • Oman, Charles W.C (1902). The Byzantine Empire. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
  • Todd, Malcolm (1999). The Early Germans. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-16397-2.
  • Waldman, Carl; Mason, Allan R. (2006). Encyclopedia of European Peoples. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 978-0-81604-964-6.
  • Wallace-Hadrill, John MichaelThe Barbarian West, 400–1000. 3rd ed. London: Hutchison, 1967.
  • Wolfram, Herwig (1988). History of the Goths. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-52006-983-1.
  • Wolfram, Herwig (1997). The Roman Empire and its Germanic Peoples. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-08511-6.

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Newly found inscription at Pompeii rewrites the history of the eruption, The Telegraph news

Giacobbe Giusti, Newly found inscription at Pompeii rewrites the history of the eruption, The Telegraph news

Archeologists found mosaics depicting wild animals, including what appears to be a crocodile and hunting dogs

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Newly found inscription at Pompeii rewrites the history of the eruption, The Telegraph news

Frescoes in the Criptoporticus Domus at UN World Heritage Site of Pompeii.

Frescoes in the Criptoporticus Domus at UN World Heritage Site of Pompeii. Credit: MARIO LAPORTA/AFP/Getty Images

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Newly found inscription at Pompeii rewrites the history of the eruption, The Telegraph news

The inscription and frescoes came to light during a new phase of excavations at Pompeii

Giacobbe Giusti, Newly found inscription at Pompeii rewrites the history of the eruption, The Telegraph news

The inscription, in charcoal, was written in October AD 79 - meaning Vesuvius erupted three months later than previously thought

Giacobbe Giusti, Newly found inscription at Pompeii rewrites the history of the eruption, The Telegraph news

Archeologists found this remarkable mosaic of a woman in the two villas

Archeologists in Pompeii have found an inscription written in charcoal that suggests the eruption of Mt Vesuvius, which buried the town, happened two months later than previously thought.

The charcoal writing, discovered on the wall of a villa during a new phase of excavations, adds weight to a theory that the volcano destroyed the town in October AD 79 rather than August of that year.

The Italian authorities said the new discovery “rewrites the history” of Pompeii, revising the widely-held belief that the eruption happened on August 24.

The inscription reads, in Latin, XVI K NOV – the 16th day before the first day of November in the Roman calendar, in other words October 17.

The inscription may have been written by a builder or architect who was working on the restoration of a villa a few days before the eruption, possibly as a way of recording the work he had done.

Remarkably, it survived the catastrophic eruption of Vesuvius, which buried much of the town in ash and pumice and which experts now believe occurred on October 24.

The inscription, in charcoal, was written in October AD 79 - meaning Vesuvius erupted three months later than previously thought
The inscription, in charcoal, was written in October AD 79 – meaning Vesuvius erupted three months later than previously thought CREDIT: POMPEII

“It’s an extraordinary find and finally gives us a certain date for the eruption,” said Massimo Osanna, the director of Pompeii.

The inscription and date was found along with other bits of writing, much of it ribald. “On the walls of the atrium and corridor of the villa there is a notable quantity of graffiti, which is still being studied, with phrases that are in some cases of an obscene character,” archeologists said in a statement.

Experts also uncovered mosaics depicting wild animals such as crocodiles, snakes, deer and lions, as well as frescoes of gods such as Venus, Adonis, Paris and Eros.

An archeologist works on restoring frescoes on a villa wall

An archeologist works on restoring frescoes on a villa wall CREDIT: POMPEII

The decorations were uncovered in the remains of two villas, parts of which were excavated in the 19th century.

In one villa, archeologists found the skeletal remains of at least five people who had tried to find refuge in the inner rooms of the property but were killed by the effects of the eruption.

Alberto Bonisoli, the cultural heritage minister, who visited Pompeii to see the new discoveries, said: “The inscription helps us to more precisely date the famous eruption – it didn’t happen in August but in October.

Archeologists found mosaics depicting wild animals, including what appears to be a crocodile and hunting dogs
Archeologists found mosaics depicting wild animals, including what appears to be a crocodile and hunting dogs CREDIT: POMPEII

“In a small way we are rewriting the history books, which until now have cited Pliny the Younger, who wrote of the eruption happening on August 24.”

Much of what is known about the destruction of Pompeii comes from Pliny, who witnessed the eruption and described it in letters to the historian Tacitus.

Some scholars cautioned, however, that the idea that the volcano erupted in October had been mooted before.

Archeologists found this remarkable mosaic of a woman in the two villas

Archeologists found this remarkable mosaic of a woman in the two villas CREDIT: POMPEII

Archeologists have found at Pompeii the calcified remains of fresh pomegranates, suggesting that the cataclysm happened in autumn because pomegranate trees do not mature as early as August.

Pomegranate season typically lasts from October until January or February.

The discovery of a calcified branch with berries on back in the 19th century had also raised the idea that the eruption may have happened later than August.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/10/16/newly-found-inscription-pompeii-rewrites-history-eruption-mt/

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

バシリカ ・ ディ ・ サン ・ ミケーレ ・ マッジョーレ、中世の教会、詳細のパヴィア (イタリア、ロンバルディア州): 外観 写真素材 - 48402996

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

Risultati immagini per basilica di San Michele Maggiore

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

File:Pavia SanMichele WestFacade MainPortal LeftSculptures.JPG

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

File:Pavia SanMichele SouthSide Nave Portal RightCapitals.jpg

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

バシリカ ・ ディ ・ サン ・ ミケーレ ・ マッジョーレ、中世の教会、詳細のパヴィア (イタリア、ロンバルディア州): 外観 写真素材 - 46798151

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

Façade.

Giacobbe Giusti, Basilica of San Michele Maggiore, Pavia

View of the crossing dome.

The Basilica of San Michele Maggioreis a church of Pavia, one of the most striking example of Lombard-Romanesque style. It dates from the 11th and 12th centuries.

 

History

A first church devoted to St. Michael Archangel was built on the location of the Lombard Palace chapel (to this period belongs the lower section of the bell tower), but it was destroyed by a fire in 1004. The current construction was begun in the late 11th century (crypt, choir and transept) and was completed by 1155. The vaults of the nave, originally with two grossly squared groin-vaulted spans, were replaced in 1489 by Agostino da Candia by four rectangular spans.

The basilica was the seat of numerous important events, including the coronations of Louis III (900) and Frederick Barbarossa (1155), among the others.

Architecture

San Michele Maggiore can be considered the prototype of other important medieval churches in Pavia such as San Pietro in Ciel d’Oroand San Teodoro. However, it differentiates from latter in the use of sandstone instead of bricks, and for the Latin cross plan with a nave and two aisles and a much extended transept. San Michele’s transept, provided with a true façade, a false apse and a barrel vault different from the rest of the church, constitutes a nearly independent section of the edifice. Also its length (38 m, compared to the 55 m of the whole basilica), contributes to this impression.

At the crossing of nave and transept is the octagonal dome, a 30 m-high asymmetrical structure supported on squinches, in the Lombard-Romanesque style. It is reportedly the earliest example of this form in Lombardy. The façade is decorated by numerous sandstone sculptures, of religious or profane themes; they are however now much deteriorated. The façade has five double and two single mullioned windows and a cross, which are a 19th-century reconstruction of what was thought be the original scheme. Bas reliefs in horizontal bands portray human, animal and fantastic figures. Over the minor portals are portrayed St. Ennodiusbishop of Pavia, and St. Eleucadius, archbishop of Ravenna. In the lunettes are angels which, according to a caption sculpted there, have the role of ambassadors of the faithful’s words into heaven.

The nave has four spans. The aisles have matronaea with statical function. The four chapels in correspondence of the second and four spans of the aisles are a later addition. under the apse, which has a large 16th-century fresco, is the high altar (1383) housing the remains of Sts. Ennodius and Eleucadius. The presbytery has fragments of a notable pavement mosaic with the Labours of the Months and mythological themes.

The crypt, with a nave and two aisles, is located immediately under the altar: it houses beautifully decorated capitals and the monument of the Blessed Martino Salimbene (1491).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Michele_Maggiore,_Pavia

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com

Giacobbe Giusti, MICHELANGELO: The Entombment, National Gallery

Giacobbe Giusti, MICHELANGELO: The Entombment, National Gallery

 

Giacobbe Giusti, MICHELANGELO: The Entombment, National Gallery

 

Entombment Michelangelo.jpg
Artist Michelangelo
Year circa 1500–1501
Medium Tempera on panel
Dimensions 162 cm × 150 cm (64 in × 59 in)
Location London, National Gallery

The Entombment is an unfinished painting of the placing of the body of Jesus in the garden tomb, now generally attributed to the Italian Renaissance master Michelangelo Buonarroti and dated to around 1500 or 1501. It is in the National Gallery in London, which purchased the work in 1868 from Robert Macpherson, a Scottish photographer resident in Rome who, according to various conflicting accounts,[1] had acquired the painting there some 20 years before.

History

The chronological position of this work has been the source of some dispute, although it is generally considered an early work.[2] Some authorities believe that it may have been executed by one of Michelangelo’s pupils from a drawing by the master or was a direct imitation of his work.[3]

According to documents discovered in 1981,[4] Michelangelo had been commissioned to paint a panel for the church of Sant’Agostino in Rome, but in the end gave back the sum received. It is probable that this work was the Entombment, which remained unfinished upon Michelangelo’s return to Florence.

There is an anecdote that Michelangelo received a letter from his father saying that he should abandon whatever he was doing because a great piece of marble had arrived for him, which would become his David sculpture.[citation needed]

Depiction

The centre of the panel portrays Christ being carried up a flight of steps to the sepulchre, which was intended to be painted in the blank area at the top right of the work. The bearded older man behind him is probably Joseph of Arimathea, who gave up his tomb for use as Christ’s sepulchre. The long-haired figure on the left is probably Saint John, wearing a long orange-red gown, with one of the Marys (possibly Mary Magdalene) kneeling at his feet.

The identity of the two figures on the right is uncertain. Suggested identities for the elongated inner figure range from Nicodemus to one of the Marys,[5] while the figure on the far right may be Mary Salome. The large unfinished area at the bottom right was intended to be used for the kneeling form of the Virgin Mary.

The floating appearance of some of the figures may be partly explained by the fact that the painting is intended to be viewed from below,[6] and to the fact that it is unfinished. However, the apparent incongruity of the stance of the bearer on the right remains problematical.[7]

Many of the unfinished parts of the painting, such as the cloak of the missing Virgin, would have required quantities of the expensive lapis lazuli blue. If this was in short supply, it could be that this would have held up completion of the painting, which may explain why it was unfinished.[8] However, even if this were so, it would not explain why the artist could not have completed the many other parts of the painting that did not require any blue.[9]

Notes

  1. Jump up^ Michael Hirst and Jill Dunkerton, Making and Meaning: the Young Michelangelo, National Gallery Publications, London, 1994 at 131, endnote 11.
  2. Jump up^ Hirst and Dunkerton, op cit at 60.
  3. Jump up^ Sepoltura di Cristo: La tela incompiuta di Michelangelo (in Italian)
  4. Jump up^ Michael Hirst, 1981. Michelangelo in Rome: an altar-piece and the’Bacchus’, The Burlington Magazine, October 1981:581ff.
  5. Jump up^ Hirst and Dunkerton, op cit at 67.
  6. Jump up^ Andrew Graham-Dixon, “Anatomy of a Genius”, The Independent, 25 October 1994, http://www.andrewgrahamdixon.com/archive/readArticle/891
  7. Jump up^ Hirst and Dunkerton, op cit at 69.
  8. Jump up^ Hirst and Dunkerton, op cit at 70, 123
  9. Jump up^ Philip McCouat, “Michelangelo’s disputed Entombment“, http://www.artinsociety.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Entombment_(Michelangelo)

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

Prozession an der Kirche Santa Maria in Aracoeli in Rom. Signiert unten links: Osw. Achenbach. Öl auf Leinwand. 54 x 46,5 cm.

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

 

 

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

Santa Maria in Aracoeli Seiteneingang Mosaik.J

Basilica of St. Mary of the Altar of Heaven
Basilica di Santa Maria in Aracoeli (in Italian)
Basilica Sanctae Mariae de Ara coeli (in Latin)
Aracoeli-fachada.jpg

Façade of the Basilica with the monumental staircase.
Basic information
Location RomeItaly
Geographic coordinates 41°53′38″N12°29′00″ECoordinates41°53′38″N 12°29′00″E
Affiliation Roman Catholic
Ecclesiastical or organizational status Minor basilica
Leadership Salvatore De Giorgi
Website Official Website
Architectural description
Architectural type Church
Architectural style RomanesqueGothic
Completed 12th century
Specifications
Direction of façade West by South
Length 80 metres (260 ft)
Width 45 metres (148 ft)
Width (nave) 20 metres (66 ft)

The Basilica of St. Mary of the Altar of Heaven (LatinBasilica Sanctae Mariae de Ara coeli in CapitoliumItalianBasilica di Santa Maria in Ara coeli al Campidoglio) is a titularbasilica in Rome, located on the highest summit of the Campidoglio. It is still the designated Church of the city council of Rome, which uses the ancient title of Senatus Populusque Romanus. The present Cardinal Priest of the Titulus Sanctae Mariae de Aracoeliis Salvatore De Giorgi.

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

Interior of the church.

Giacobbe Giusti, Santa Maria in Ara Coeli

Fresco of Madonna and the Childby Pietro Cavallini.

The shrine is known for housing relics belonging to Saint Helena, mother of Emperor Constantine, various minor relics from the Holy Sepulchre, both the canonically crowned images of Nostra Signora di Mano di Oro di Aracoeli (1636) on the high altar and the Santo Bambino of Aracoeli (1897).

History

Originally the church was named Sancta Maria in Capitolio, since it was sited on the Capitoline Hill(Campidoglio, in Italian) of Ancient Rome; by the 14th century it had been renamed. A medieval legend included in the mid-12th-century guide to RomeMirabilia Urbis Romae, claimed that the church was built over an Augustan Ara primogeniti Dei, in the place where the Tiburtine Sibylprophesied to Augustus the coming of the Christ. “For this reason the figures of Augustus and of the Tiburtine sibyl are painted on either side of the arch above the high altar” (Lanciani chapter 1). A later legend[citation needed] substituted an apparition of the Virgin Mary. In the Middle Ages, condemned criminals were executed at the foot of the steps; there the self-proclaimed Tribune and reviver of the Roman Republic Cola di Rienzomet his death, near the spot where his statue commemorates him.

In The History of Money, anthropologist Jack Weatherford goes into some detail about the church’s previous incarnation as the temple of Juno Moneta—on the Arx—after whom Money is named.

According to Roman historians, in the fourth century B.C., the irritated honking of the sacred geese around Juno’s temple on Capitoline Hill warned the people of an impending night attack by the Gauls, who were secretly scaling the walls of the citadel. From this event, the goddess acquired [the] surname-Juno Moneta, from Latin monere (to warn). . .As patroness of the state, Juno Moneta presided over various activities of the state, including the primary activity of issuing money.

. . . from Moneta came the modem English words mint and money and, ultimately, from the Latin word meaning warning.

Today, the site of the Temple of Juno Moneta, the source of the great stream of Roman currency, has given way to the ancient . . . brick church of Santa Maria in Aracoeli. Centuries ago, church architects incorporated the ruins of the ancient temple into the new building.[1]

The church is also thought to have replaced the auguraculum, the seat of the augurs.

The foundation of the church was laid on the site of a Byzantine abbey mentioned in 574. Many buildings were built around the first church; in the upper part they gave rise to a cloister, while on the slopes of the hill a little quarter and a market grew up. Remains of these buildings – such as the little church of San Biagio de Mercato and the underlying “Insula Romana“) – were discovered in the 1930s. At first the church followed the Greek rite, a sign of the power of the Byzantine exarch. Taken over by the papacy by the 9th century, the church was given first to the Benedictines, then, by papal bull to the Franciscans in 1249–1250; under the Franciscans it received its RomanesqueGothicaspect. The arches that divide the nave from the aisles are supported on columns, no two precisely alike, scavenged from Roman ruins.

During the Middle Ages, this church became the centre of the religious and civil life of the city. in particular during the republican experience of the 14th century, when Cola di Rienzo inaugurated the monumental stairway of 124 steps in front of the church, designed in 1348 by Simone Andreozzi, on the occasion of the Black Death.

Central fresco by Pinturicchio in the S. Bernardino Chapel (1486).

Ceiling.

Madonna Aracoeli

In 1571, Santa Maria in Aracoeli hosted the celebrations honoring Marcantonio Colonna after the victorious Battle of Lepanto over the Turkish fleet. Marking this occasion, the compartmented ceiling was gilded and painted (finished 1575), to thank the Blessed Virgin for the victory. In 1797, with the Roman Republic, the basilica was deconsecrated and turned into a stable.

Interior

The original unfinished façade has lost the mosaics and subsequent frescoes that originally decorated it, save a mosaic in the tympanumof the main door, one of three doors that are later additions. The Gothic window is the main detail that tourists can see from the bottom of the stairs, but it is the sole truly Gothic detail of the church.

The church is built as a nave and two aisles that are divided by Roman columns, all different, taken from diverse antique monuments. Among its numerous treasures are Pinturicchio‘s 15th-century frescoes depicting the life of Saint Bernardino of Siena in the Bufalini Chapel, the first chapel on the right. Other features are the wooden ceiling, the inlaid cosmatesque floor, a Transfiguration painted on wood by Girolamo Siciolante da Sermoneta, the tombstone of Giovanni Crivelli by Donatello, the tomb of Cecchino dei Bracci, designed by his friend Michelangelo (who also wrote love sonnets in his dedication), and works by other artists like Pietro Cavallini (of his frescoes only one survives), Benozzo Gozzoli and Giulio Romano. It houses also Madonna Aracoeli (Our Lady of the Golden Hands), (Byzantian icon, the 10-11th-century) in the Altar. This Marian image was Pontifically crowned on 29 March 1636 by Pope Urban VIIIPope Pius XIIconsecrated the people of Rome to the Most Blessed Virgin Mary and her Immaculate Heart in front of this image in 1948, May 30. In the transept there is a sepulchral monument by Arnolfo di Cambio. The church was also famous in Rome for the wooden statue of the Santo Bambino of Aracoeli, carved in the 15th century of olive wood coming from the Gethsemane garden and covered with valuable ex-votos. Many people of Rome believed in the power of this statue. It had been taken by the French in 1797, was later recovered, yet stolen again in February 1994. A copy was made from Gethsemane wood,[2] which is now displayed in its own chapel by the sacristy. At midnight Mass on Christmas Eve the image is brought out to a throne before the high altar and unveiled at the Gloria. Until Epiphany the jewel-encrusted image resides in the Nativity crib in the left nave.

The relics of Saint Helena, mother of Constantine the Great are housed at Santa Maria in Aracoeli, as are the remains of Saint Juniper, one of the original followers of Saint Francis of AssisiPope Honorius IV and Queen Catherine of Bosnia are also buried in the church. The tablet with the monogram of Jesus that Saint Bernardino of Siena used to promote devotion to the Holy Name of Jesus is kept in Aracoeli.

Burials

Curiosities

  • The church also contains the marble tomb of Cecchino Bracci, pupil and lover of artist Michelangelo who had dedicated a number of poems in his name. The tomb’s design (not the carving) is by Michelangelo.
  • A part of the last mission of the videogame Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood takes place in this basilica.
  • In this church, football player Francesco Totti and Ilary Blasi celebrated their marriage in 2005, followed by thousands of fans.[3]

References

  1. Jump up^ Weatherford, Jack McIver (1997). The History of Money: From Sandstone to Cyberspace. New York: Three Rivers Press. p. 48. ISBN 9780609801727.
  2. Jump up^ Ingrid D. Rowland (2012) Anachronic Renaissance, Konsthistorisk tidskrift/ Journal of Art History, 81:3, 172-177, DOI: 10.1080/00233609.2012.706234
  3. Jump up^ Farrell, Paul (27 May 2017). “Ilary Blasi, Francesco Totti’s Wife: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know”Heavy.com. Retrieved 29 May 2018.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Maria_in_Ara_Coeli

http://www.giacobbegiusti.com